Connect with us

Did You See This?

Demons in Children’s Books? Virginia Candidate Sparks Fury with ‘Demonic’ Literature!

Published

on

In a shocking turn of events, Jeremy D. Rodden, a pro-LGBT candidate endorsed by the Virginia Democrat Party and running for the House of Delegates in the state’s conservative 90th District, is facing intense scrutiny and concern from concerned parents. The controversy centers around his associations with a satanic after-school group and his authorship of what are described as “demonic” children’s books, as reported by the Daily Wire.

Rodden, who has received strong backing from various leftist groups and individuals, is campaigning on an education-focused platform to unseat the Republican incumbent in the 90th District. However, his involvement with dark and troubling themes in his literature and his association with the After School Satan Club have raised significant alarms among parents, especially those of Catholic faith.

Some of Rodden’s books, including “UnCommon Evil” and “Demonic Household,” have ignited outrage among parents for their disturbing content. Concerned parents argue that these books are wholly inappropriate for children and go beyond what they consider acceptable boundaries for children’s literature.

Moreover, the controversy deepened when Rodden was found to be promoting an After School Satan Club at a local primary school. This development has added fuel to the fire, with parents expressing their profound disapproval of introducing such a group into their children’s educational environment. Many Catholic parents are particularly outraged, as they see it as a direct affront to their religious values and beliefs.

As the story continues to unfold, Jeremy D. Rodden’s campaign is now under intense scrutiny from concerned parents who fear that his associations with the satanic after-school group and the content of his “demonic” children’s books may have a detrimental impact on their children’s well-being and education. This controversy has brought to the forefront the ongoing debate about the role of education and the boundaries of expression in a politically charged environment.

Did You See This?

Can America Afford To Ignore The Israel-Hamas CRISIS?

Published

on

There’s a lot to be said about America First, but can we really ignore what’s happening in Israel right now? Maybe not.

WATCH:

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

BREAKING: Do These Pro-Palestine Americans Even Know What They’re Talking About?!

Published

on

It’s tragic that these kids truly don’t understand what they’re protesting. Watch this beauty queen SCHOOL them on the basic facts of the Israel-Palestine conflict.

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

YIKES! This Transgender Breastfeeding Story Is TOO WILD To Even Believe

Published

on

In a shocking and deeply concerning revelation, a transgender biological man with HIV, Murray Pearson, has been actively “breastfeeding” his infant, despite the inherent risk of HIV transmission. What makes this situation even more alarming is the involvement of Canadian doctors who are aiding and abetting this dangerous behavior.

Pearson, who identifies as a woman and goes by the name Margie Fancypants on social media, began his transition in 2022, taking drugs to induce lactation. His journey has been documented on a Reddit forum for transgenders, where he openly discusses his desire to “connect through feeding” his 9-month-old baby. The details of his actions are nothing short of horrifying.

Acknowledging his HIV positive status, Pearson admits that the transmission of the virus to his infant through breast milk is a distinct possibility if his viral load becomes detectable. Viral load refers to the amount of HIV in the blood at a given time. While he plans to monitor his viral load monthly to purportedly “mitigate the risk,” the question remains: why expose the child to any risk in the first place?

The nonchalant use of the term “mitigate risk” in this context is both alarming and irresponsible. The safety and well-being of the infant should be the paramount concern. Why not eliminate the risk entirely by choosing not to expose the child to potential HIV transmission?

One of Pearson’s doctors, Dr. Marina Klein, attempts to justify the situation by stating, “It’s important to emphasize that we do not recommend breastfeeding for people with HIV… [however] If, after informed discussion, a person expresses a wish to breastfeed they may choose to do so provided they are willing to follow a close protocol of viral monitoring.” This raises serious ethical questions about the medical community’s role in enabling such risky choices.

We cannot turn a blind eye to the fact that a child’s health is being compromised for the sake of someone’s personal desires. The decision to breastfeed, despite the potential transmission of a life-altering virus, is simply unacceptable. It is crucial for society to speak out against such actions that put innocent lives at risk.

This disturbing scenario demands not only public awareness but also a reevaluation of medical ethics. The welfare of children must always take precedence over individual choices, especially when those choices can have severe consequences. As we contemplate this distressing situation, our thoughts and prayers go out to the vulnerable infant caught in the midst of this perilous circumstance.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.