Connect with us

Raising Them Right

BREAKING: Dr. Phil Boldly Speaks Out Against Rushed Approvals for Child “Gender-Affirming Care

Published

on

In a recent appearance on “The Joe Rogan Experience,” former daytime TV talk show host Dr. Phil McGraw fearlessly criticized major medical associations for endorsing child “gender-affirming care” without sufficient research. Dr. Phil questioned the hasty approval of procedures like sex reassignment surgery and hormone therapy for children, emphasizing the lack of comprehensive studies on potential long-term harm.

Expressing his concerns, Dr. Phil highlighted the use of terms like ‘gender-affirming care’ as a clever way to camouflage what essentially involves invasive medical interventions on minors. He specifically called out organizations such as the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Endocrine Society for providing their endorsement without a thorough examination of the potential risks.

“I have never seen those organizations sign off on anything with less information as to whether or not it does long-term harm, of anything in my life,” Dr. Phil remarked, emphasizing the importance of the medical community adhering to the principle of “first do no harm.”

Dr. Phil drew attention to the decisions made by European countries, including Sweden and Norway, which halted “gender-affirming care” for children in 2022. Citing the European countries’ conscientious objection to endorsing procedures lacking concrete evidence of benefits, Dr. Phil underlined the ethical dilemma faced by medical professionals.

The conversation between Dr. Phil and Joe Rogan delved into the notion that raising concerns about the potential harm of these procedures often leads to being labeled as transphobic, inhibiting open discussions on the topic. Dr. Phil stressed the importance of acknowledging the real and complex issues associated with gender dysphoria, rather than relying on unproven methods that may not address the root causes.

The World Health Organization’s decision not to issue recommendations on “gender-affirming care” for children and adolescents under 20 years old, due to a lack of scientific literature, further supports Dr. Phil’s argument. This cautious approach aligns with the stance taken by European countries that have halted such interventions until more conclusive evidence is available.

In conclusion, Dr. Phil’s bold stance against the rushed approval of child “gender-affirming care” serves as a call for more critical evaluation within the medical community. As he promises to showcase the real results of these interventions in upcoming shows, Dr. Phil urges society to question the motives behind these endorsements and advocates for a more measured and responsible approach to the well-being of young individuals grappling with issues of gender identity.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Raising Them Right

ARE YOU SERIOUS!? Kids Pledge Allegiance to Gay Pride Flag

Published

on

The gay agenda has been after kids and this video of Pete Buttigeig’s husband proves it.

WATCH:

Continue Reading

Raising Them Right

Shocking Realities of Youth Transgender Healthcare – It Is WORSE Than We Thought!

Published

on

In a shocking revelation, Environmental Progress recently obtained leaked documents from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), shedding light on the disturbing and sinister reality of youth and adult transgender healthcare. The findings, published by the Daily Caller, uncover a troubling pseudoscience that has infiltrated American children’s lives, surpassing previous expectations.

WPATH’s Influence on Transgender Healthcare:

As the leading organization guiding doctors, hospitals, and clinics on transgender healthcare, WPATH holds significant influence in shaping medical practices for individuals with gender dysphoria. While just three years ago, the transgender craze was perceived as affecting a limited number of confused individuals, the rapid increase in self-identifications, particularly among young girls, has turned it into a widespread societal concern.

The Betrayal of Trust:

At the core of this issue lies the question of whether parents can trust the medical information provided by their doctors. The leaked documents make it abundantly clear that trust in the medical guidance offered by WPATH is misplaced. Shockingly, professionals in the field discussed the necessity of obtaining two authorization letters for the surgical removal of a minor girl’s breasts, dismissing concerns as “gatekeeping.”

Informed Consent and Unproven Science:

The documents reveal a consensus among the world’s top minds in transgender medicine that minors cannot provide informed consent for hormone blockers, cross-sex hormones, or surgeries altering healthy sex organs. This raises concerns about parents lacking the biological knowledge necessary to make informed decisions for their children’s healthcare.

Progressive Activism and Parental Rights:

The attack on parental protections becomes apparent, with progressive activists pushing for policies that separate children from parents who refuse to conform to the “affirmation” model. Parents seeking alternatives may face accusations of abuse, further limiting their ability to make decisions in the best interest of their children.

Misleading Information on Reversibility:

For a significant period, the medical community portrayed hormone blockers and hormonal treatments as reversible or non-permanent solutions. However, the report exposes the falsehood of these claims, revealing lifelong complications such as infertility, lack of orgasm, and an increased risk of developing cancerous masses.

Hidden Dangers of Cross-Sex Hormones:

The WPATH Files detail the dangers of cross-sex hormones, including pelvic inflammatory disease, cardiovascular issues, and even death. Medical professionals recount cases of severe health complications linked to prolonged use of these hormones, highlighting the urgent need for a reassessment of current practices.

Conclusion:

The shocking revelations within the WPATH Files showcase the alarming mistreatment of children in the name of transgender healthcare. The medical community’s obligation to “do no harm” is disregarded in this context, prompting a call for government investigations to ensure the safety and well-being of these vulnerable patients. It is essential to bring attention to these issues and work towards reforms that prioritize the health and future of the children affected by these controversial practices.

Continue Reading

Raising Them Right

SHOCKING: What Activists DON’T Want You to Know About Trans Suicide Rates

Published

on

In a groundbreaking study led by Dr. Riittakerttu Kaltiala, a former advocate for gender-transition treatments, the mainstream narrative regarding the life-saving nature of such interventions for young people has been called into question. Contrary to popular belief, the study, based on health records from Finland’s national database, reveals that gender-transition treatments have no discernible impact on suicide rates among gender-distressed individuals. Instead, the research highlights a correlation between mental illness and suicide.

The Study Design

Dr. Kaltiala’s study analyzed the health records of 2,083 gender-distressed individuals, who sought assistance at gender clinics in Finland at an average age of 18. This group was tracked for approximately 7 years. To provide a comparative context, a control group of 17,000 individuals without gender-related concerns was also examined.

Surprising Findings

The study challenges the widely held belief that gender-transition treatments, including cross-sex hormones or surgeries, are “life-saving” for young people facing gender distress. While 38% of the gender-distressed group underwent such interventions, the suicide rate observed was just 0.3%, only marginally higher than the 0.1% rate in the control group. The study categorizes both rates as “unusual events,” casting doubt on the notion that gender-transition treatments significantly impact suicide prevention.

Questioning Ethical Standards

Dr. Kaltiala criticized the common practice of gender clinics posing questions to parents such as, “Would you rather have a living son or a dead daughter?” She labeled this approach as “most unethical” and emphasized that it is not grounded in factual evidence. The study suggests a need for a more nuanced and evidence-based dialogue around gender-transition treatments.

Mental Health Correlation

While the study did not find a direct link between gender-transition treatments and suicide rates, it did unveil a “statistically significant relationship” between a high prevalence of co-occurring mental health difficulties and increased suicide risk. This highlights the importance of addressing mental health concerns in conjunction with gender-related issues.

Implications and Contradictions

The research challenges the radical left-wing narrative that has been promulgated by certain medical and LGBTQ groups, claiming that the “science is settled” regarding the life-saving nature of gender-transition treatments. The study’s findings suggest a need for a more nuanced and evidence-based understanding of the complex relationship between gender dysphoria, mental health, and suicide risk.

Conclusion

Dr. Kaltiala’s study presents a significant challenge to the prevailing narrative surrounding gender-transition treatments and their purported life-saving impact on young people. By questioning the ethical standards of communication within gender clinics and highlighting the correlation between mental health difficulties and suicide risk, the research calls for a more informed and balanced approach to discussions on gender-related interventions.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.