Connect with us

Did You See This?

Challenging Mainstream Narratives: Unpacking the Latest Nonsense Study on ‘Top Surgery’

As always with the mainstream media, we can never be too quick to accept their findings without scrutiny.



Well, this is unsettling.

A new study that’s being lauded by liberal media outlets as validation for the advantages of top surgery within the transgender community. Now, before we delve into this, let me make it clear that my primary concern is the well-being of our youth and the integrity of scientific research.

Published in the prestigious JAMA Surgery journal just a few days ago, this study claims to showcase an overwhelming sense of contentment among transgender individuals who have undergone breast removal for so-called “gender-affirmation” purposes. According to the report, participants expressed a “median satisfaction score” of a perfect “5 on a 5-point scale,” coupled with a “median decisional regret score” of a bafflingly low “0 on a 100-point scale.” This, they conclude, proves the prevalence of “low rates of decisional regret and high levels of satisfaction with decision following gender-affirming mastectomy.”

As always with the mainstream media, we can never be too quick to accept these findings without scrutiny. Several key concerns have been raised by individuals who value rigorous analysis and transparency.

Leor Sapir, a distinguished fellow at the Manhattan Institute, took to Twitter to express his incredulity at the way CNN reported on this study. He pointed out a glaring omission: Do we truly believe that the experiences of adults undergoing surgery in their late twenties can be directly applied to impressionable teenage girls aged 13 to 16? This omission speaks volumes about the study’s limitations and the media’s handling of it.

And the issues don’t stop there. The study managed to gather responses from only 59.1 percent of its participants. This abysmal response rate hints at a serious problem – a high likelihood of selection bias.

We must question whether the experiences of those who chose not to respond were different from those who did.

Nephrologist Brent A. Williams couldn’t hide his incredulity, expressing that the study’s conclusions seemed simply implausible. His skepticism echoes the sentiments of many who believe that there’s more to this story than meets the eye.

What’s also noteworthy is a study from the renowned Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, which indicated a five percent regret rate among breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomies. This contrast underscores the importance of considering a wider spectrum of experiences and outcomes.

One aspect of the JAMA Surgery study is particularly concerning: all participants supposedly met the standards set by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) before undergoing mastectomy. This is noteworthy because WPATH has previously endorsed the idea of minors gaining access to top surgery. This begs the question – are we prioritizing the psychological well-being of our youth or conforming to shifting standards?

Our friends at the Heritage Foundation have long scrutinized similar research endeavors, noting that such studies often rely on surveys of adults affiliated with trans support and advocacy groups, making them far from representative of all those who struggled with gender dysphoria as adolescents. There’s a glaring absence of individuals who managed to navigate these challenges without resorting to medical intervention, which skews the overall picture.

Let’s approach these findings with a discerning eye and an understanding that sensationalism in the media might not always tell the whole truth. Our youth deserve the best care and support, and that involves comprehensive, transparent research that takes all perspectives into account. Until next time, stay informed and stay vigilant!

Did You See This?

SHOCKING BETRAYAL: Republicans Side with Democrats to Protect OPEN BORDERS Mayorkas!



In a shocking turn of events on Capitol Hill, a group of Republicans has seemingly abandoned the party’s core principles, compromising the nation’s security in the process. House Democrats, with the help of a faction of misguided Republicans, successfully derailed an attempt led by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. This move, cloaked in political maneuvering, undermines the very essence of conservative values and raises serious questions about the commitment of some Republicans to safeguarding the American people.

The Border Crisis:

Mayorkas’ handling of the border crisis has been nothing short of disastrous, with a staggering 260,000 migrant encounters at the southern border in September alone. This unprecedented surge has raised legitimate concerns among Republicans who prioritize national security and public safety. The influx of illegal immigrants evading Border Patrol agents has reached alarming proportions, with over 600,000 reported cases in the past fiscal year. The situation demands a robust and immediate response, not political gamesmanship.

The Compromise:

The final vote, 209-201, reflects a disheartening reality where eight Republicans chose to align themselves with Democrats, betraying the very principles they were elected to uphold. By supporting a motion to refer the impeachment resolution to the House Homeland Security Committee instead of a direct vote, these Republicans have effectively shielded Mayorkas from being held directly accountable for his failures. This compromise not only jeopardizes the security of our borders but also sets a dangerous precedent for future challenges to our national interests.

Concerns Over National Security:

The decision to thwart the impeachment motion sends a troubling message about the priorities of these Republicans. At a time when national security is at stake, the party should stand united in demanding accountability from those entrusted with protecting our borders. The concerns raised by Republican lawmakers about the potential threats posed by the unchecked flow of illegal immigrants cannot be dismissed lightly. Public safety and national security must always take precedence over partisan politics.


The alliance between Democrats and these wayward Republicans in derailing the impeachment of Secretary Mayorkas is a regrettable episode in recent political history. It reflects a departure from conservative values and a failure to prioritize the well-being of the American people. As the border crisis continues to escalate, the nation cannot afford such compromises on matters of national security. The Republican Party must refocus on its core principles and unite in addressing the pressing issues that threaten the safety and prosperity of the United States.

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

SHOCKING: Liberals In Virginia Said NO To This Porn Star Candidate!



In a recent election for Virginia’s House of Delegates, the Democratic candidate Susanna Gibson found herself in a steamy scandal that ultimately cost her the race. Let’s dive into the delightful details, shall we?

Gibson, a supposed champion of the Democratic Party, decided to make headlines of a rather salacious nature. She was caught red-handed uploading explicit videos of herself and her husband engaging in adult activities on a popular pornographic website, Chaturbate. Oh, how the mighty have fallen! The Washington Post uncovered this little gem of a story, and it spread like wildfire.

It’s a little ironic, don’t you think? Democrats often tout themselves as champions of women’s rights and defenders of morality, yet here was one of their own shamelessly peddling her intimacy for the sake of a few dollars from online viewers. I guess principles tend to fly out the window when there’s a quick buck to be made.

To add salt to the wound, several Democratic officials, who had initially endorsed Gibson’s candidacy, promptly distanced themselves from her after the scandal broke. It seems they didn’t want to be associated with the embarrassment, and who could blame them?

But hold onto your hats! Despite the explicit videos and the loss of endorsements, Gibson decided to keep campaigning. Her primary focus? Abortion. She accused Republican candidates of seeking to restrict the procedure unreasonably. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! It’s hard not to roll your eyes at the sheer audacity of it all.

And what was the result, you may ask? Did the good people of Virginia stand with Gibson and her liberal virtue-signaling? Absolutely not! David Owen, the Republican candidate, emerged victorious by a slim margin of 966 votes. It’s almost as if the voters saw through the hypocrisy and chose a candidate who had his priorities straight.

In the end, despite Gibson’s best efforts, Democrats did manage to secure control of the House of Delegates and retained their grip on the state Senate. But it’s a Pyrrhic victory at best, especially when they had to carry the baggage of a candidate who brought shame to their party.

David Owen, the man of the hour, didn’t even stoop to using Gibson’s scandal as campaign material. He remained focused on the issues that truly matter to the people of Virginia. After his well-deserved victory, Owen expressed his readiness to work and serve the community. Now, that’s the kind of leadership Virginia needs!

In conclusion, Susanna Gibson’s fall from grace is a prime example of the hypocrisy that often runs rampant in liberal politics. It’s a cautionary tale for all those who prioritize virtue signaling over genuine principles. Virginia, like the rest of the country, deserves leaders who can walk the talk and focus on the real issues at hand. Congratulations to David Owen for his win, and may his tenure bring some much-needed sanity to the House of Delegates.

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

Demons in Children’s Books? Virginia Candidate Sparks Fury with ‘Demonic’ Literature!



In a shocking turn of events, Jeremy D. Rodden, a pro-LGBT candidate endorsed by the Virginia Democrat Party and running for the House of Delegates in the state’s conservative 90th District, is facing intense scrutiny and concern from concerned parents. The controversy centers around his associations with a satanic after-school group and his authorship of what are described as “demonic” children’s books, as reported by the Daily Wire.

Rodden, who has received strong backing from various leftist groups and individuals, is campaigning on an education-focused platform to unseat the Republican incumbent in the 90th District. However, his involvement with dark and troubling themes in his literature and his association with the After School Satan Club have raised significant alarms among parents, especially those of Catholic faith.

Some of Rodden’s books, including “UnCommon Evil” and “Demonic Household,” have ignited outrage among parents for their disturbing content. Concerned parents argue that these books are wholly inappropriate for children and go beyond what they consider acceptable boundaries for children’s literature.

Moreover, the controversy deepened when Rodden was found to be promoting an After School Satan Club at a local primary school. This development has added fuel to the fire, with parents expressing their profound disapproval of introducing such a group into their children’s educational environment. Many Catholic parents are particularly outraged, as they see it as a direct affront to their religious values and beliefs.

As the story continues to unfold, Jeremy D. Rodden’s campaign is now under intense scrutiny from concerned parents who fear that his associations with the satanic after-school group and the content of his “demonic” children’s books may have a detrimental impact on their children’s well-being and education. This controversy has brought to the forefront the ongoing debate about the role of education and the boundaries of expression in a politically charged environment.

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.