Connect with us

Did You See This?

Challenging Mainstream Narratives: Unpacking the Latest Nonsense Study on ‘Top Surgery’

As always with the mainstream media, we can never be too quick to accept their findings without scrutiny.



Well, this is unsettling.

A new study that’s being lauded by liberal media outlets as validation for the advantages of top surgery within the transgender community. Now, before we delve into this, let me make it clear that my primary concern is the well-being of our youth and the integrity of scientific research.

Published in the prestigious JAMA Surgery journal just a few days ago, this study claims to showcase an overwhelming sense of contentment among transgender individuals who have undergone breast removal for so-called “gender-affirmation” purposes. According to the report, participants expressed a “median satisfaction score” of a perfect “5 on a 5-point scale,” coupled with a “median decisional regret score” of a bafflingly low “0 on a 100-point scale.” This, they conclude, proves the prevalence of “low rates of decisional regret and high levels of satisfaction with decision following gender-affirming mastectomy.”

As always with the mainstream media, we can never be too quick to accept these findings without scrutiny. Several key concerns have been raised by individuals who value rigorous analysis and transparency.

Leor Sapir, a distinguished fellow at the Manhattan Institute, took to Twitter to express his incredulity at the way CNN reported on this study. He pointed out a glaring omission: Do we truly believe that the experiences of adults undergoing surgery in their late twenties can be directly applied to impressionable teenage girls aged 13 to 16? This omission speaks volumes about the study’s limitations and the media’s handling of it.

And the issues don’t stop there. The study managed to gather responses from only 59.1 percent of its participants. This abysmal response rate hints at a serious problem – a high likelihood of selection bias.

We must question whether the experiences of those who chose not to respond were different from those who did.

Nephrologist Brent A. Williams couldn’t hide his incredulity, expressing that the study’s conclusions seemed simply implausible. His skepticism echoes the sentiments of many who believe that there’s more to this story than meets the eye.

What’s also noteworthy is a study from the renowned Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, which indicated a five percent regret rate among breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomies. This contrast underscores the importance of considering a wider spectrum of experiences and outcomes.

One aspect of the JAMA Surgery study is particularly concerning: all participants supposedly met the standards set by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) before undergoing mastectomy. This is noteworthy because WPATH has previously endorsed the idea of minors gaining access to top surgery. This begs the question – are we prioritizing the psychological well-being of our youth or conforming to shifting standards?

Our friends at the Heritage Foundation have long scrutinized similar research endeavors, noting that such studies often rely on surveys of adults affiliated with trans support and advocacy groups, making them far from representative of all those who struggled with gender dysphoria as adolescents. There’s a glaring absence of individuals who managed to navigate these challenges without resorting to medical intervention, which skews the overall picture.

Let’s approach these findings with a discerning eye and an understanding that sensationalism in the media might not always tell the whole truth. Our youth deserve the best care and support, and that involves comprehensive, transparent research that takes all perspectives into account. Until next time, stay informed and stay vigilant!

Did You See This?

YIKES! This Transgender Breastfeeding Story Is TOO WILD To Even Believe



In a shocking and deeply concerning revelation, a transgender biological man with HIV, Murray Pearson, has been actively “breastfeeding” his infant, despite the inherent risk of HIV transmission. What makes this situation even more alarming is the involvement of Canadian doctors who are aiding and abetting this dangerous behavior.

Pearson, who identifies as a woman and goes by the name Margie Fancypants on social media, began his transition in 2022, taking drugs to induce lactation. His journey has been documented on a Reddit forum for transgenders, where he openly discusses his desire to “connect through feeding” his 9-month-old baby. The details of his actions are nothing short of horrifying.

Acknowledging his HIV positive status, Pearson admits that the transmission of the virus to his infant through breast milk is a distinct possibility if his viral load becomes detectable. Viral load refers to the amount of HIV in the blood at a given time. While he plans to monitor his viral load monthly to purportedly “mitigate the risk,” the question remains: why expose the child to any risk in the first place?

The nonchalant use of the term “mitigate risk” in this context is both alarming and irresponsible. The safety and well-being of the infant should be the paramount concern. Why not eliminate the risk entirely by choosing not to expose the child to potential HIV transmission?

One of Pearson’s doctors, Dr. Marina Klein, attempts to justify the situation by stating, “It’s important to emphasize that we do not recommend breastfeeding for people with HIV… [however] If, after informed discussion, a person expresses a wish to breastfeed they may choose to do so provided they are willing to follow a close protocol of viral monitoring.” This raises serious ethical questions about the medical community’s role in enabling such risky choices.

We cannot turn a blind eye to the fact that a child’s health is being compromised for the sake of someone’s personal desires. The decision to breastfeed, despite the potential transmission of a life-altering virus, is simply unacceptable. It is crucial for society to speak out against such actions that put innocent lives at risk.

This disturbing scenario demands not only public awareness but also a reevaluation of medical ethics. The welfare of children must always take precedence over individual choices, especially when those choices can have severe consequences. As we contemplate this distressing situation, our thoughts and prayers go out to the vulnerable infant caught in the midst of this perilous circumstance.

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

Gemini Gate: Learn All About Google’s WOKE AI Disaster



In a recent controversy, Google’s artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, Gemini, faced backlash for its image generation tool, which displayed blatant racial bias against white individuals. This incident has ignited concerns about the extent to which Google’s AI algorithms may be influenced by a perceived “woke” ideology.

Gemini, essentially Google’s counterpart to ChatGPT, utilizes AI to generate human-like prompts for various purposes, including writing essays, web code, and, most recently, creating images. However, the tool faced significant criticism when users discovered instances of racial bias in its depictions of historical figures.

Historical figures, including the Founding Fathers, Vikings, and the Pope, were portrayed in a way that seemed to intentionally invert their actual racial identities. The Founding Fathers were depicted as black, Vikings as black and Asian, and the Pope as a black man and an Indian woman. This sparked outrage on social media, prompting Google to take down the image-generation tool and issue an apology, acknowledging that they “got it wrong.”

In their apology, Google hinted at the incorporation of racial “equity” in their strategy, stating that media representation has historically favored white individuals and their achievements. They suggested that focusing solely on white individuals risks perpetuating this imbalance. While acknowledging the need for diverse representation is crucial, the incident raises concerns about the potential bias and lack of nuance in Google’s AI algorithms.

Conservatives and independents have long expressed apprehensions about Google’s left-wing and perceived anti-white bias, particularly in its search tool. This incident adds to a growing list of instances that amplify these concerns. Critics argue that Google’s commitment to diversity and equity may be pushing their AI algorithms towards producing content that is not only inaccurate but also reflects a biased narrative.

Federalist founder Sean Davis pointed out the broader issue, stating, “The purpose of a system is what it produces. Google exists to produce lies and manipulate minds in service of a left-wing ideological agenda.” This sentiment reflects the worry that Google’s AI algorithms may be overly influenced by ideological considerations, compromising their ability to provide objective and unbiased information.

As technology continues to play an integral role in shaping our understanding of the world, it is crucial to hold AI developers accountable for ensuring fairness, accuracy, and impartiality. The Gemini incident serves as a reminder that as AI becomes more sophisticated, the potential for unintended biases and the amplification of certain ideologies also increases. Striking a balance between promoting diversity and avoiding bias is a delicate task that requires continuous scrutiny and improvement in AI development processes.

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

Joe Biden’s Open Borders Endangering American Lives: The Tragic Case of Laken Riley



As a concerned parent, I find myself grappling with a sense of profound grief and anger over the tragic murder of 22-year-old University of Georgia nursing student Laken Riley. Her life was cut short in a brutal act of violence that serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of lax immigration policies, particularly the open-border approach championed by President Joe Biden and his administration.

The man charged with this heinous crime is Jose Antonio Ibarra, a Venezuelan national who entered the U.S. illegally in 2022 by crossing the southern border in Texas. Shockingly, this was not Ibarra’s first encounter with law enforcement. In the preceding year, he had been arrested in New York for endangering a 5-year-old child. However, the New York Police Department inexplicably released him before Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) could take appropriate action.

Tragically, this decision had devastating consequences. Last Thursday, Laken Riley went missing after going for a jog on a trail at the University of Georgia. Her lifeless body was discovered in a wooded area off the trail, with law enforcement describing the murder as “a crime of opportunity.” Ibarra has been charged with a litany of serious offenses, including malice murder, felony murder, aggravated battery, aggravated assault, false imprisonment, kidnapping, hindering a 911 call, and concealing the death of another.

What compounds the tragedy is the fact that Athens-Clarke County, where this gruesome murder occurred, is one of four sanctuary cities in Georgia. Sanctuary policies limit cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities, creating an environment where individuals like Ibarra can slip through the cracks and pose a grave danger to the community.

Equally disturbing is the media’s coverage of this heartbreaking incident. The Associated Press, in its reporting, highlighted the “dangers for female joggers” but glaringly omitted any mention that Laken Riley’s killer was an illegal alien who had previously been arrested. This type of selective reporting only serves to obscure the broader issue at hand and contributes to a lack of transparency about the real dangers posed by individuals entering the country illegally.

In the bigger picture, Laken Riley’s blood is on the hands of Joe Biden and every open-border Democrat. Since Biden took office, over 10 million illegal immigrants have been allowed to enter the United States. This staggering number underscores the urgency of reevaluating our immigration policies and addressing the inherent risks associated with an open-border approach.

The safety and well-being of American citizens must be the top priority. It is high time for our leaders to acknowledge the devastating consequences of their policies and take concrete actions to protect the lives of individuals like Laken Riley, who should never have fallen victim to a system that failed to prioritize the safety and security of its own citizens.

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.