Connect with us

Did You See This?

BREAKING: The Real Reason Behind Jim Jordan’s Surprising Speaker Announcement

Published

on

In a recent development that some may view as a strategic move by Congressman Jim Jordan, a staunch conservative and a favorite among many moms like myself, it appears that he has decided not to pursue a third run for the position of House Speaker. Instead, he has thrown his support behind Representative Patrick McHenry, whom he endorses as the Speaker Designee until at least January 2024. Jordan made this announcement following a closed-door meeting with his fellow GOP colleagues earlier today.

Jordan, faced two prior floor ballots earlier this week and unfortunately fell short of the required 217 votes. In the first round, he garnered the support of 200 of his fellow Republicans, and in the second round, only 199. On the other side of the aisle, Democrat Leader Hakeem Jeffries secured all 212 Democrat votes during both rounds of voting.

Interestingly, around 22 moderate Republican holdouts opted to cast their votes in an unpredictable manner, supporting various candidates, including former Speaker Kevin McCarthy, Iowa Representative Steve Scalise, and others. Their choices seemed to stem from their frustration with Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz, who played a role in ousting McCarthy earlier this month.

While Jordan had the endorsement of former President Donald Trump and even the support of McCarthy himself, he was perceived as the primary option for House Republicans. This was in part due to the withdrawal of Representative Scalise, the GOP’s Majority Leader, from the race, as he was unable to garner sufficient support from the more conservative members of the caucus.

Importantly, Jordan’s decision doesn’t rule out the possibility of him seeking the Speaker’s role in the future. It simply means that, for now, McHenry will step in as the “temporary Speaker” until a more permanent decision is made by Republicans. To ensure the House functions smoothly during this interim period, it appears that McHenry will need to be granted expanded powers, a move that lawmakers, including Jordan, are actively pursuing. However, it’s worth noting that Congressman Gaetz has voiced strong opposition to this approach, characterizing it as a “twisting” of the U.S. Constitution, and has called for the House to remain in session until a Speaker is officially selected. As conservative moms, we will be keeping a close eye on these developments and hoping for a swift and stable resolution in the best interests of our great nation.

Did You See This?

Can America Afford To Ignore The Israel-Hamas CRISIS?

Published

on

There’s a lot to be said about America First, but can we really ignore what’s happening in Israel right now? Maybe not.

WATCH:

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

BREAKING: Do These Pro-Palestine Americans Even Know What They’re Talking About?!

Published

on

It’s tragic that these kids truly don’t understand what they’re protesting. Watch this beauty queen SCHOOL them on the basic facts of the Israel-Palestine conflict.

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

YIKES! This Transgender Breastfeeding Story Is TOO WILD To Even Believe

Published

on

In a shocking and deeply concerning revelation, a transgender biological man with HIV, Murray Pearson, has been actively “breastfeeding” his infant, despite the inherent risk of HIV transmission. What makes this situation even more alarming is the involvement of Canadian doctors who are aiding and abetting this dangerous behavior.

Pearson, who identifies as a woman and goes by the name Margie Fancypants on social media, began his transition in 2022, taking drugs to induce lactation. His journey has been documented on a Reddit forum for transgenders, where he openly discusses his desire to “connect through feeding” his 9-month-old baby. The details of his actions are nothing short of horrifying.

Acknowledging his HIV positive status, Pearson admits that the transmission of the virus to his infant through breast milk is a distinct possibility if his viral load becomes detectable. Viral load refers to the amount of HIV in the blood at a given time. While he plans to monitor his viral load monthly to purportedly “mitigate the risk,” the question remains: why expose the child to any risk in the first place?

The nonchalant use of the term “mitigate risk” in this context is both alarming and irresponsible. The safety and well-being of the infant should be the paramount concern. Why not eliminate the risk entirely by choosing not to expose the child to potential HIV transmission?

One of Pearson’s doctors, Dr. Marina Klein, attempts to justify the situation by stating, “It’s important to emphasize that we do not recommend breastfeeding for people with HIV… [however] If, after informed discussion, a person expresses a wish to breastfeed they may choose to do so provided they are willing to follow a close protocol of viral monitoring.” This raises serious ethical questions about the medical community’s role in enabling such risky choices.

We cannot turn a blind eye to the fact that a child’s health is being compromised for the sake of someone’s personal desires. The decision to breastfeed, despite the potential transmission of a life-altering virus, is simply unacceptable. It is crucial for society to speak out against such actions that put innocent lives at risk.

This disturbing scenario demands not only public awareness but also a reevaluation of medical ethics. The welfare of children must always take precedence over individual choices, especially when those choices can have severe consequences. As we contemplate this distressing situation, our thoughts and prayers go out to the vulnerable infant caught in the midst of this perilous circumstance.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.