Did You See This?
BREAKING: Did Barack Obama Really Smoke Crack and Engage in Same-Sex Relations?
I was troubled to hear Tucker Carlson’s recent claims about Barack Obama. In a podcast discussion with Adam Carolla, Carlson boldly asserted, “In 2008 it became really clear that Barack Obama had been having sex with men and smoking crack.” Such shocking allegations deeply concern me.
Carlson supported his statements by mentioning an upcoming interview he had scheduled with Larry Sinclair, a homosexual man who made headlines during the 2008 U.S. Presidential campaign season. Sinclair had shared his account of two past encounters involving sex and drug use with the Democratic presidential candidate. Carlson recounted Sinclair’s unwavering commitment to his claims, stating, “[Sinclair] said ‘I’ll sign an affidavit,’ and he did. ‘I’ll take a lie detector,’ and he did.”
Quoting Sinclair directly, Carlson added, “‘I smoked crack with Barack Obama and had sex with him,'” and confidently asserted, “That was obviously true.”
Carlson did not stop there. He continued to emphasize his belief in the authenticity of the Larry Sinclair story, declaring, “The Larry Sinclair story definitely happened. I’ve talked to Larry Sinclair about it. Definitely it happened. This story, if you listen to it in detail, is clearly true.”
According to Carlson, the reason mainstream media outlets did not report on these allegations was not due to their squeamishness about discussing sensitive topics such as sex and drugs, but rather because of the strong-arm tactics employed by the Obama campaign. He claimed, “Nobody [in mainstream media] reported it, not because they were squeamish about sex or drugs but because the Obama campaign said, ‘Anyone who reports on this gets no access to the Obama campaign.’ So they didn’t report on it.”
There’s a lot to be said about America First, but can we really ignore what’s happening in Israel right now? Maybe not.
WATCH:
It’s tragic that these kids truly don’t understand what they’re protesting. Watch this beauty queen SCHOOL them on the basic facts of the Israel-Palestine conflict.
In a shocking and deeply concerning revelation, a transgender biological man with HIV, Murray Pearson, has been actively “breastfeeding” his infant, despite the inherent risk of HIV transmission. What makes this situation even more alarming is the involvement of Canadian doctors who are aiding and abetting this dangerous behavior.
Pearson, who identifies as a woman and goes by the name Margie Fancypants on social media, began his transition in 2022, taking drugs to induce lactation. His journey has been documented on a Reddit forum for transgenders, where he openly discusses his desire to “connect through feeding” his 9-month-old baby. The details of his actions are nothing short of horrifying.
Acknowledging his HIV positive status, Pearson admits that the transmission of the virus to his infant through breast milk is a distinct possibility if his viral load becomes detectable. Viral load refers to the amount of HIV in the blood at a given time. While he plans to monitor his viral load monthly to purportedly “mitigate the risk,” the question remains: why expose the child to any risk in the first place?
The nonchalant use of the term “mitigate risk” in this context is both alarming and irresponsible. The safety and well-being of the infant should be the paramount concern. Why not eliminate the risk entirely by choosing not to expose the child to potential HIV transmission?
One of Pearson’s doctors, Dr. Marina Klein, attempts to justify the situation by stating, “It’s important to emphasize that we do not recommend breastfeeding for people with HIV… [however] If, after informed discussion, a person expresses a wish to breastfeed they may choose to do so provided they are willing to follow a close protocol of viral monitoring.” This raises serious ethical questions about the medical community’s role in enabling such risky choices.
We cannot turn a blind eye to the fact that a child’s health is being compromised for the sake of someone’s personal desires. The decision to breastfeed, despite the potential transmission of a life-altering virus, is simply unacceptable. It is crucial for society to speak out against such actions that put innocent lives at risk.
This disturbing scenario demands not only public awareness but also a reevaluation of medical ethics. The welfare of children must always take precedence over individual choices, especially when those choices can have severe consequences. As we contemplate this distressing situation, our thoughts and prayers go out to the vulnerable infant caught in the midst of this perilous circumstance.-
Get Right6 months agoBREAKING: Are Flu Shots Harming The Elderly?
-
Did You See This?9 months agoChallenging Mainstream Narratives: Unpacking the Latest Nonsense Study on ‘Top Surgery’
-
Raising Them Right8 months agoBREAKING: CNN Host Grills Fauci on Mask Lies – You Won’t Believe His Response
-
Did You See This?9 months agoWOW! Did A Federal Court Just Admit They Unfairly Targeted Pro-Lifers?
-
Did You See This?9 months agoNew Research Exposes Alarming Connection Between Abortion and Mental Health
-
Did You See This?8 months agoBREAKING: Are We Really Going To FORCE KIDS To Wear Masks Again?
-
Did You See This?9 months agoExciting News About Parents’ Rights! New Bill Puts Parents in the Know
-
Raising Them Right9 months agoBREAKING: Vivek Ramaswamy Stands Up for Traditional Values at the Iowa State Fair
