Connect with us

Did You See This?

WOW! Did A Federal Court Just Admit They Unfairly Targeted Pro-Lifers?

In a stunning revelation, a federal appeals court boldly stated that the government can’t just play favorites in public debates by enforcing laws in a way that picks winners and losers.

Published

on

You won’t believe the audacity of Washington D.C.’s so-called “defacement” laws and their shameless double standards. Let’s break it down for you, because this is a prime example of liberal hypocrisy at its finest.

So, what’s this D.C. defacement law, you ask? Well, it’s supposedly all about preventing damage and vandalism to public or private property. You know, the usual stuff – graffiti, markings without permission, and whatnot. Sounds fair, right? But hold onto your hats, because it’s about to get interesting.

Let’s talk selective enforcement, shall we? In the scorching summer of 2020, when BLM protestors flooded the streets with their demands, they also flooded the streets with paint and chalk. Streets and sidewalks became canvases for their “expression.” Did law enforcement step in, arrest the masses, and uphold justice? Not even close! A grand total of four people faced the music for violating the defacement law. Four! It’s almost laughable.

But wait, there’s more. As the summer heat simmered down, a pro-life protest dared to challenge the liberal status quo. A smaller protest, mind you, yet it managed to set off alarms in D.C. What happened next? Brace yourselves – two brave pro-life advocates were actually arrested for using chalk to write “black pre-born lives matter” on a sidewalk. Oh, the horror! It’s as if D.C. Metro Police believed that chalk was a more dangerous weapon than actual paint.

Well, you know what they say about justice being blind? It seems like the folks at the Frederick Douglass Foundation and Students for Life of America had enough of this double standard nonsense. They decided to fight back and filed a lawsuit against the city, claiming their constitutional rights were stomped on by this outrageous selective enforcement.

And guess what? The federal appeals court saw right through D.C.’s charade. They reversed a lower court’s decision to dismiss the case, and rightfully so. In a stunning revelation, they boldly stated that the government can’t just play favorites in public debates by enforcing laws in a way that picks winners and losers. It’s a remarkable moment when the courts finally stand up for true equality.

So, get ready for the showdown that’s about to unfold. With the dismissal reversal, this case is back on track and ready to expose the hypocrisy that runs rampant in the liberal heart of D.C. It’s about time someone called them out on their biased game, and these brave conservative groups are leading the charge.

Did You See This?

Can America Afford To Ignore The Israel-Hamas CRISIS?

Published

on

There’s a lot to be said about America First, but can we really ignore what’s happening in Israel right now? Maybe not.

WATCH:

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

BREAKING: Do These Pro-Palestine Americans Even Know What They’re Talking About?!

Published

on

It’s tragic that these kids truly don’t understand what they’re protesting. Watch this beauty queen SCHOOL them on the basic facts of the Israel-Palestine conflict.

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

YIKES! This Transgender Breastfeeding Story Is TOO WILD To Even Believe

Published

on

In a shocking and deeply concerning revelation, a transgender biological man with HIV, Murray Pearson, has been actively “breastfeeding” his infant, despite the inherent risk of HIV transmission. What makes this situation even more alarming is the involvement of Canadian doctors who are aiding and abetting this dangerous behavior.

Pearson, who identifies as a woman and goes by the name Margie Fancypants on social media, began his transition in 2022, taking drugs to induce lactation. His journey has been documented on a Reddit forum for transgenders, where he openly discusses his desire to “connect through feeding” his 9-month-old baby. The details of his actions are nothing short of horrifying.

Acknowledging his HIV positive status, Pearson admits that the transmission of the virus to his infant through breast milk is a distinct possibility if his viral load becomes detectable. Viral load refers to the amount of HIV in the blood at a given time. While he plans to monitor his viral load monthly to purportedly “mitigate the risk,” the question remains: why expose the child to any risk in the first place?

The nonchalant use of the term “mitigate risk” in this context is both alarming and irresponsible. The safety and well-being of the infant should be the paramount concern. Why not eliminate the risk entirely by choosing not to expose the child to potential HIV transmission?

One of Pearson’s doctors, Dr. Marina Klein, attempts to justify the situation by stating, “It’s important to emphasize that we do not recommend breastfeeding for people with HIV… [however] If, after informed discussion, a person expresses a wish to breastfeed they may choose to do so provided they are willing to follow a close protocol of viral monitoring.” This raises serious ethical questions about the medical community’s role in enabling such risky choices.

We cannot turn a blind eye to the fact that a child’s health is being compromised for the sake of someone’s personal desires. The decision to breastfeed, despite the potential transmission of a life-altering virus, is simply unacceptable. It is crucial for society to speak out against such actions that put innocent lives at risk.

This disturbing scenario demands not only public awareness but also a reevaluation of medical ethics. The welfare of children must always take precedence over individual choices, especially when those choices can have severe consequences. As we contemplate this distressing situation, our thoughts and prayers go out to the vulnerable infant caught in the midst of this perilous circumstance.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.