The gay agenda has been after kids and this video of Pete Buttigeig’s husband proves it.

WATCH:

In a groundbreaking study led by Dr. Riittakerttu Kaltiala, a former advocate for gender-transition treatments, the mainstream narrative regarding the life-saving nature of such interventions for young people has been called into question. Contrary to popular belief, the study, based on health records from Finland’s national database, reveals that gender-transition treatments have no discernible impact on suicide rates among gender-distressed individuals. Instead, the research highlights a correlation between mental illness and suicide.

The Study Design

Dr. Kaltiala’s study analyzed the health records of 2,083 gender-distressed individuals, who sought assistance at gender clinics in Finland at an average age of 18. This group was tracked for approximately 7 years. To provide a comparative context, a control group of 17,000 individuals without gender-related concerns was also examined.

Surprising Findings

The study challenges the widely held belief that gender-transition treatments, including cross-sex hormones or surgeries, are “life-saving” for young people facing gender distress. While 38% of the gender-distressed group underwent such interventions, the suicide rate observed was just 0.3%, only marginally higher than the 0.1% rate in the control group. The study categorizes both rates as “unusual events,” casting doubt on the notion that gender-transition treatments significantly impact suicide prevention.

Questioning Ethical Standards

Dr. Kaltiala criticized the common practice of gender clinics posing questions to parents such as, “Would you rather have a living son or a dead daughter?” She labeled this approach as “most unethical” and emphasized that it is not grounded in factual evidence. The study suggests a need for a more nuanced and evidence-based dialogue around gender-transition treatments.

Mental Health Correlation

While the study did not find a direct link between gender-transition treatments and suicide rates, it did unveil a “statistically significant relationship” between a high prevalence of co-occurring mental health difficulties and increased suicide risk. This highlights the importance of addressing mental health concerns in conjunction with gender-related issues.

Implications and Contradictions

The research challenges the radical left-wing narrative that has been promulgated by certain medical and LGBTQ groups, claiming that the “science is settled” regarding the life-saving nature of gender-transition treatments. The study’s findings suggest a need for a more nuanced and evidence-based understanding of the complex relationship between gender dysphoria, mental health, and suicide risk.

Conclusion

Dr. Kaltiala’s study presents a significant challenge to the prevailing narrative surrounding gender-transition treatments and their purported life-saving impact on young people. By questioning the ethical standards of communication within gender clinics and highlighting the correlation between mental health difficulties and suicide risk, the research calls for a more informed and balanced approach to discussions on gender-related interventions.

A recent report has highlighted growing concerns among Democrats about President Joe Biden’s use of notecards during closed-door fundraisers and calls with prescreened donors. The worries primarily revolve around questions about the president’s age and ability to handle the demands of an extended presidential campaign or potential debates with rivals.

According to Axios, President Biden, who is 81 years old, uses notecards, even during staged sessions with donors. While Biden’s advisers argue that the notecards are employed for addressing detailed and technical questions, some donors are skeptical, questioning whether he can endure the pressures of a rigorous campaign or debates, particularly against former President Donald Trump, who is four years younger at 77.

Unlike several recent presidents, including Trump, who have used teleprompters or crib notes in public events, donors have noted that Biden is also relying on notecards during private conversations with donors. This has fueled concerns among some contributors, who wonder if this practice reflects a potential struggle with the stresses of the presidential race.

The Biden campaign has dismissed these concerns, emphasizing the importance of focusing on issues that matter to the American people in the upcoming 2024 election. Biden campaign spokesperson Kevin Munoz addressed the worries, pointing to a recent court ruling in Alabama regarding frozen embryos as an example of “news that matters.”

Axios reports that Biden’s use of notecards is part of a strategic approach by his staff to ensure the success of his fundraisers. The president’s packed schedule has provided his campaign and the Democratic National Committee with a substantial financial advantage leading up to the November election. Biden, drawing on his extensive experience in politics, also expects thorough preparation for his meetings.

While some donors argue that Biden has always been an off-the-cuff speaker, citing his ability to provide spontaneous answers during discussions, others are concerned about the recent report from Robert Hur, the special counsel in Biden’s documents investigation. Hur described the president as a “well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” raising further questions about Biden’s fitness for the presidency.

Adding to the concerns, a Quinnipiac University poll released this week indicates that two-thirds of voters believe Biden is too old to serve as president. In contrast, 41% of respondents think Trump is too old. This public sentiment may further contribute to the unease among Democrats regarding Biden’s candidacy.

As the 2024 election approaches, Democrats are grappling with concerns over President Biden’s use of notecards and its implications for his ability to navigate the demands of a campaign. The mixed views on his speaking style, coupled with public perceptions reflected in polls, create a challenging landscape for the Democratic Party as they assess the viability of Biden’s candidacy.