The Biden administration is once again pushing its left-leaning agenda, this time by proposing a rule that would impact foster families and their ability to address the complex issue of gender identity in children. The Administration for Children and Families (ACF), part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), recently released a proposal that, in our view, infringes on the rights and beliefs of conservative families.

According to the proposal, foster families would be required to “affirm” a child’s gender confusion, embracing a set of guidelines for children who identify as part of the LGBTQ+ spectrum. The proposal makes it clear that any provider who attempts to offer alternative perspectives or support to children regarding their sexual orientation or gender identity would be considered unsuitable.

Moreover, the proposal cites the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration to argue against any efforts aimed at helping children accept their biological sex or heterosexuality. It claims that such efforts are “inappropriate, ineffective, and harmful practices,” effectively silencing any dissenting viewpoints on this matter.

The proposal also mandates that foster families must use a child’s chosen name and pronouns, and allow them to dress in a manner they believe reflects their self-identified gender identity. Failure to comply with these requirements would result in the family being deemed unsuitable for placing LGBTQ+ children.

Additionally, the proposal recommends providing a range of services and activities tailored specifically to the needs of gender-confused foster children. This includes access to behavioral health supports, interaction with LGBTQ+ mentors and peers, participation in affinity groups, and connection to LGBTQ+ supportive resources and events.

Furthermore, the proposal leaves the door open for endorsing hormonal and surgical interventions for gender-confused children. It does so by vaguely referring to “clinically appropriate mental and behavioral health care,” without providing clear guidelines or safeguards. This is concerning, as it leaves room for potential harm to these vulnerable children.

Even though some medical organizations support such interventions, it’s important to note that there are serious concerns about their long-term effects. Puberty blockers have raised concerns about infertility, and certain cross-sex hormones have been linked to increased risks of heart attack, stroke, and suicidality. Some individuals who have undergone gender transitions have expressed regret, and some have even pursued legal action against the adults who facilitated these irreversible choices when they were still minors.

Lastly, the proposal does mention religious liberty and the protection of conscience, as mandated by the First Amendment and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). However, it also states that exemptions may not be granted even if a religious practice is substantially burdened, if it is deemed necessary to advance a compelling government interest through the least restrictive means possible.

In conclusion, this proposal raises significant concerns for conservative families who hold different beliefs about gender and sexuality. It appears to prioritize a specific ideological agenda over the rights and values of diverse foster families. If you wish to voice your opinion on this matter, you can submit written comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal until November 27, using the Regulatory Information Number (RIN) 0970-AD03.