Connect with us

Raising Them Right

DeSantis’ Bold Pledge: A Game-Changer for Pro-Life Voters in 2024

Published

on

In the world of conservative politics, Florida Republican Governor Ron DeSantis has emerged as a prominent figure and a potential candidate for the 2024 presidential election. His unwavering commitment to pro-life values has recently garnered attention, setting him apart from some of his fellow conservatives. In this blog post, we’ll delve into Governor DeSantis’ stance on abortion and the contrasting viewpoints within the Republican Party.

Governor DeSantis has made it clear that he stands firmly on the side of life. During a pivotal moment in a GOP primary debate, fellow candidate Tim Scott posed a critical question: Would DeSantis endorse a nationwide 15-week abortion ban if elected president? Without hesitation, DeSantis answered in the affirmative, solidifying his commitment to protecting the unborn.

Governor DeSantis had previously enacted a 15-week abortion ban within the state of Florida in April 2022. This groundbreaking law, although currently facing legal challenges from abortion proponents, remains in effect until a final resolution is reached in the courts. The move reflects DeSantis’ dedication to advancing the pro-life cause, even in the face of opposition.

Florida’s constitution historically recognized a “right to abortion” under the privacy amendment, as interpreted by a longstanding state Supreme Court ruling. However, in a significant development, Florida’s Supreme Court agreed to review the 15-week abortion ban in January 2023, potentially paving the way for changes in the state’s abortion rights landscape. The law’s enforcement will continue until a final decision is reached, providing an opportunity to challenge the status quo.

Not content with just the 15-week abortion ban, Governor DeSantis signed a more comprehensive pro-life law in April 2023. This law prohibits abortions once a baby’s heartbeat becomes detectable at around six weeks of gestation. However, its implementation is contingent on the resolution of the ongoing legal challenge against the state’s 15-week abortion ban.

Governor DeSantis is not alone in his support for a nationwide 15-week abortion ban. He shares this stance with prominent conservatives such as Tim Scott, Arkansas Governor Asa Hutchinson, and former Vice President Mike Pence. Together, they advocate for restricting abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy across the entire country.

While DeSantis and his pro-life allies champion a stringent approach to abortion restrictions, former President Donald Trump, the Republican front-runner for 2024, takes a different stance. Trump has refrained from committing to signing a 15-week abortion ban into law. Instead, he calls for bipartisan negotiations to address the abortion issue, exploring the possibility of a gestational weeks limit that could find support from both sides and resolve the national debate.

In addition to his stance, Trump has criticized the messaging surrounding the abortion issue, attributing the defeat of many candidates he endorsed during the 2022 midterm elections to it. Specifically, he expressed disapproval of DeSantis’ decision to sign the six-week heartbeat law, labeling it as “terrible.” DeSantis, however, firmly refuted Trump’s allegations during the GOP primary debate. He emphasized that other factors contributed to the midterm losses of pro-life candidates and urged Trump to engage with long-time pro-life advocates to explain his assertions.

Governor Ron DeSantis’ unwavering commitment to pro-life values and his willingness to sign a nationwide 15-week abortion ban, should he secure the White House in 2024, position him as a formidable contender in the conservative landscape. His dedication to protecting the unborn contrasts with the approach of other prominent Republicans, adding depth and diversity to the party’s dialogue on this critical issue. As the 2024 presidential race unfolds, Governor DeSantis’ pro-life stance will undoubtedly play a significant role in shaping the national conversation.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Raising Them Right

ARE YOU SERIOUS!? Kids Pledge Allegiance to Gay Pride Flag

Published

on

The gay agenda has been after kids and this video of Pete Buttigeig’s husband proves it.

WATCH:

Continue Reading

Raising Them Right

Shocking Realities of Youth Transgender Healthcare – It Is WORSE Than We Thought!

Published

on

In a shocking revelation, Environmental Progress recently obtained leaked documents from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), shedding light on the disturbing and sinister reality of youth and adult transgender healthcare. The findings, published by the Daily Caller, uncover a troubling pseudoscience that has infiltrated American children’s lives, surpassing previous expectations.

WPATH’s Influence on Transgender Healthcare:

As the leading organization guiding doctors, hospitals, and clinics on transgender healthcare, WPATH holds significant influence in shaping medical practices for individuals with gender dysphoria. While just three years ago, the transgender craze was perceived as affecting a limited number of confused individuals, the rapid increase in self-identifications, particularly among young girls, has turned it into a widespread societal concern.

The Betrayal of Trust:

At the core of this issue lies the question of whether parents can trust the medical information provided by their doctors. The leaked documents make it abundantly clear that trust in the medical guidance offered by WPATH is misplaced. Shockingly, professionals in the field discussed the necessity of obtaining two authorization letters for the surgical removal of a minor girl’s breasts, dismissing concerns as “gatekeeping.”

Informed Consent and Unproven Science:

The documents reveal a consensus among the world’s top minds in transgender medicine that minors cannot provide informed consent for hormone blockers, cross-sex hormones, or surgeries altering healthy sex organs. This raises concerns about parents lacking the biological knowledge necessary to make informed decisions for their children’s healthcare.

Progressive Activism and Parental Rights:

The attack on parental protections becomes apparent, with progressive activists pushing for policies that separate children from parents who refuse to conform to the “affirmation” model. Parents seeking alternatives may face accusations of abuse, further limiting their ability to make decisions in the best interest of their children.

Misleading Information on Reversibility:

For a significant period, the medical community portrayed hormone blockers and hormonal treatments as reversible or non-permanent solutions. However, the report exposes the falsehood of these claims, revealing lifelong complications such as infertility, lack of orgasm, and an increased risk of developing cancerous masses.

Hidden Dangers of Cross-Sex Hormones:

The WPATH Files detail the dangers of cross-sex hormones, including pelvic inflammatory disease, cardiovascular issues, and even death. Medical professionals recount cases of severe health complications linked to prolonged use of these hormones, highlighting the urgent need for a reassessment of current practices.

Conclusion:

The shocking revelations within the WPATH Files showcase the alarming mistreatment of children in the name of transgender healthcare. The medical community’s obligation to “do no harm” is disregarded in this context, prompting a call for government investigations to ensure the safety and well-being of these vulnerable patients. It is essential to bring attention to these issues and work towards reforms that prioritize the health and future of the children affected by these controversial practices.

Continue Reading

Raising Them Right

SHOCKING: What Activists DON’T Want You to Know About Trans Suicide Rates

Published

on

In a groundbreaking study led by Dr. Riittakerttu Kaltiala, a former advocate for gender-transition treatments, the mainstream narrative regarding the life-saving nature of such interventions for young people has been called into question. Contrary to popular belief, the study, based on health records from Finland’s national database, reveals that gender-transition treatments have no discernible impact on suicide rates among gender-distressed individuals. Instead, the research highlights a correlation between mental illness and suicide.

The Study Design

Dr. Kaltiala’s study analyzed the health records of 2,083 gender-distressed individuals, who sought assistance at gender clinics in Finland at an average age of 18. This group was tracked for approximately 7 years. To provide a comparative context, a control group of 17,000 individuals without gender-related concerns was also examined.

Surprising Findings

The study challenges the widely held belief that gender-transition treatments, including cross-sex hormones or surgeries, are “life-saving” for young people facing gender distress. While 38% of the gender-distressed group underwent such interventions, the suicide rate observed was just 0.3%, only marginally higher than the 0.1% rate in the control group. The study categorizes both rates as “unusual events,” casting doubt on the notion that gender-transition treatments significantly impact suicide prevention.

Questioning Ethical Standards

Dr. Kaltiala criticized the common practice of gender clinics posing questions to parents such as, “Would you rather have a living son or a dead daughter?” She labeled this approach as “most unethical” and emphasized that it is not grounded in factual evidence. The study suggests a need for a more nuanced and evidence-based dialogue around gender-transition treatments.

Mental Health Correlation

While the study did not find a direct link between gender-transition treatments and suicide rates, it did unveil a “statistically significant relationship” between a high prevalence of co-occurring mental health difficulties and increased suicide risk. This highlights the importance of addressing mental health concerns in conjunction with gender-related issues.

Implications and Contradictions

The research challenges the radical left-wing narrative that has been promulgated by certain medical and LGBTQ groups, claiming that the “science is settled” regarding the life-saving nature of gender-transition treatments. The study’s findings suggest a need for a more nuanced and evidence-based understanding of the complex relationship between gender dysphoria, mental health, and suicide risk.

Conclusion

Dr. Kaltiala’s study presents a significant challenge to the prevailing narrative surrounding gender-transition treatments and their purported life-saving impact on young people. By questioning the ethical standards of communication within gender clinics and highlighting the correlation between mental health difficulties and suicide risk, the research calls for a more informed and balanced approach to discussions on gender-related interventions.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.