In a recent decision out of Maryland, a federal court has ruled against parents seeking to protect their children from LGBTQ+ content in Montgomery County Schools. This decision has stirred up quite a controversy, and as a conservative mom blogger, I feel compelled to share my perspective on this matter.
In the case of Tamer Mahmoud v. Monica B. McKnight, parents were attempting to reinstate a policy allowing them to opt their children out of reading and discussing books featuring LGBTQ+ characters in elementary schools. Their argument was simple: the content in these books clashed with their religious beliefs and amounted to a form of indoctrination. Unfortunately, Judge Deborah L. Boardman, a Biden appointee, didn’t see it that way. She concluded that parents’ rights to direct their children’s upbringing did not include the fundamental right to opt out of a public-school curriculum that conflicted with their religious views.
The judge’s decision denied the parents’ request for a preliminary injunction to opt-out their kids when school resumed. She argued that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate that any of their claims were likely to succeed on their merits, essentially dismissing the parents’ concerns.
The controversy started when Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) introduced over 22 books featuring LGBTQ+ characters into their classrooms as part of a diversity initiative. Initially, the school district allowed parents to opt their children out from these materials, as they could with other parts of the curriculum. However, in March, the district changed its policy, effectively stripping parents of this right. This prompted a group of religious families to sue, asserting that this policy violated their First Amendment rights.
Judge Boardman’s rationale for supporting the no-opt-out policy was that it did not compel parents to refrain from teaching their faiths or violate their religious beliefs. Instead, it encouraged discussions about the topics raised by the storybooks, which she saw as acceptable within the framework of the parents’ faiths.
Eric Baxter, Vice President and Senior Counsel at Becket, the law firm representing the families, strongly opposed this ruling. He argued that it disregarded parental freedom, childhood innocence, and basic human decency, especially when it came to sensitive issues surrounding human sexuality. Baxter maintained that the School Board should respect parents’ rights to guide their children’s education in accordance with their religious beliefs.
The LGBTQ+ books in question are being used in pre-K through eighth-grade classrooms and contain references to topics like gay pride parades, gender transition, and pronoun preferences.
It’s important to note that MCPS has faced criticism in recent years for several sexual abuse controversies involving students and staff. The concerns raised by parents in this case should not be taken lightly, and it’s crucial to strike a balance between promoting diversity and respecting parents’ rights to guide their children’s education in line with their values. This decision raises questions about how best to navigate such complex and sensitive issues within the public school system.
Pronoun Police Gone Too Far? Beloved 90 Year Old Volunteer PUNISHED & You Won’t Believe Why!
In a shocking turn of events, 90-year-old Fran Itkoff, a dedicated volunteer for the National Multiple Sclerosis Society in California, has been dismissed from her role for allegedly not adhering to the organization’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) guidelines. The reason behind her dismissal? Failure to include pronouns in her email signature, a concept that left her genuinely confused.
Fran Itkoff’s story is not just about her recent dismissal; it’s a testament to a lifetime of selfless dedication. For an incredible 60 years, Itkoff volunteered with the MS Society, receiving numerous awards for her unwavering commitment. Her journey began as a response to her husband’s diagnosis with Multiple Sclerosis, a chronic autoimmune disease that affects the brain and spinal cord, leading to debilitating physical and cognitive impairments.
Itkoff’s dismissal centered around her alleged failure to comprehend and implement the organization’s DEI guidelines, specifically regarding the inclusion of gender pronouns in her email signature. Itkoff, when approached about the matter, expressed genuine confusion, stating, “I was confused. I didn’t know what it was and what it meant.” This confusion, stemming from a lack of understanding, raises questions about the appropriateness of dismissing someone who has dedicated their life to a cause.
Days after her supposed violation of DEI policies, Itkoff received a heart-wrenching email instructing her to “step down” from her volunteer position. The message read, “Unfortunately, based on the situation, we have made the difficult decision to have you step down from your volunteer position, effective immediately.” This decision, while purportedly rooted in a commitment to inclusivity, ironically excludes a 90-year-old disabled woman who has been an integral part of the organization for six decades.
Elle Hamilton, Itkoff’s daughter, aptly captures the irony of the situation. In a statement to Chaya Raichik (@LibsOfTikTok), Hamilton stated, “It’s ironic because they are saying they are inclusive, but they are excluding a 90-year-old disabled woman who has volunteered for 60 years.” Hamilton’s words resonate with the sense of injustice surrounding her mother’s dismissal, highlighting the apparent contradiction between the organization’s proclaimed values and their actions.
Fran Itkoff’s case is a poignant reminder of the potential pitfalls of overly rigid adherence to DEI guidelines. In the pursuit of inclusivity, it is crucial to consider the unique circumstances and contributions of individuals like Itkoff, who have devoted their lives to noble causes. It is high time for organizations to reevaluate their approach, ensuring that inclusivity is not achieved at the expense of the very individuals who have played an instrumental role in their success.
🚨 Shocking Revelation: 20 Million Illegals to Sway Elections! Will Your Vote Count?
Recent warnings from immigration experts about the consequences of illegal immigration on House seats and Electoral College votes in upcoming elections have left me grappling with a sense of urgency to ensure my voice is heard.
The source of this concern stems from an executive order signed by President Joe Biden in 2021, mandating that the U.S. Census Bureau includes all residents, regardless of citizenship status, in its population count. While my sympathies lie with those seeking a better life in America, the potential political ramifications cannot be ignored.
According to a conservative estimate, approximately 16.8 million illegal aliens currently reside in the United States. Some argue that the actual number might be even higher, painting a worrisome picture for the future political landscape. When considering that the average House seat represents 761,168 residents, the inclusion of illegal immigrants could potentially account for 22 House seats, a significant number that may sway the balance in future elections.
The Electoral College, a crucial aspect of presidential elections, allocates votes to states based on their representation in the House. Consequently, states gaining additional House seats, such as New York due to its sanctuary city policies, would also gain extra Electoral College votes. This scenario, as pointed out by Mark Krikorian, the executive director at the Center for Immigration Studies, is deemed outrageous by many, as illegal immigrants were never intended to be included in the census count for apportionment purposes.
In response to these concerns, Republican lawmakers have introduced the Equal Representation Act, aimed at excluding non-citizens from the Census Bureau’s counts. However, the current political landscape, with a Democratic President and Senate, makes it unlikely for such legislation to pass.
Looking at the bigger picture, the next census is not scheduled until 2030, meaning the immediate impact may not affect the upcoming election. Nevertheless, the urgency to address this issue is undeniable. If left unattended, we risk granting political representation to roughly 20 million illegal immigrants, primarily concentrated in Democratic strongholds.
While I am sympathetic to all immigrants, I find myself torn between the desire to welcome those in search of a better life and the concern that our political system may be unduly influenced. While the Equal Representation Act may face challenges in the current political climate, concerned citizens must engage in dialogue, express their views, and actively participate in shaping the future of our nation. Ensuring fair and representative governance requires a delicate balance, one that recognizes the humanity of immigrants while preserving the integrity of our democratic processes.
BREAKING: Georgia Takes a Swipe at LGBT Agenda in Education – Find Out What They Did!
Georgia has become the latest states to pass legislation to protect kids from the LGBT agenda in our schools. The Georgia Senate’s Education & Youth Committee has taken a significant step by voting along party lines to advance SB88, also known as the Parents and Children Protection Act, aiming to regulate discussions on “gender identity” issues in private schools involving students younger than 16, without parental consent.
SB88 prohibits private schools from implementing any curriculum or instruction addressing issues related to gender identity, queer theory, gender ideology, or gender transition without first obtaining express written permission from each parent. This move is seen as a crucial step in ensuring that parents remain actively involved in sensitive and potentially life-changing discussions concerning their children.
Republican state Sen. Carden Summers, a key proponent of the bill, emphasized the importance of making the legislation fair while achieving the goal of involving parents in such crucial matters. This sentiment is shared by many who believe that parents should be the primary decision-makers when it comes to guiding their children through complex issues like gender identity.
Jeff Cleghorn, a gay former board member of Georgia Equality, expressed support for the bill, stating, “They are proselytizing this queer sexuality ideology to children. Activists in schools have no business interfering with the parent-child relationship. Do not let schools teach kids to keep secrets from their parents.”
However, not all social conservatives in Georgia are in complete agreement about the law’s ramifications. Some argue that SB88 is a flawed attempt to regulate private schools, introducing the concept of gender identity into state law. Concerns have been raised that the legislation might allow public schools to override Georgia’s 2022 parental bill of rights, which emphasizes the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing and education of their children.
Cole Muzio, president of the Frontline Policy Council, a state social conservative group, voiced apprehension that SB88 could weaken parental rights and claimed it was being advanced with the assistance of the LGBTQ lobby. While concerns have been raised, it is essential to note that the debate surrounding SB88 reflects the ongoing challenge of finding a balance between parental rights and the need to address evolving societal issues in educational settings.
The Protect Students First Act, signed by Republican Gov. Brian Kemp simultaneously with SB88, focuses on prohibiting classroom instruction on certain “divisive concepts.” However, sexual orientation and gender identity were not explicitly included in the list of prohibited concepts.
As a conservative mom, I understand the importance of protecting children from what some perceive as left-wing indoctrination in schools. Recent incidents, such as the tragic story of Yaeli Martinez, underscore the potential dangers of schools reinforcing children’s gender confusion without parental knowledge. The passage of SB88 reflects a broader national trend where parents are increasingly vocal about their concerns regarding the influence of certain ideologies in the education system.
In conclusion, Georgia’s efforts to address the delicate balance between parental rights and evolving societal norms within educational settings highlight the ongoing struggle to find common ground. As discussions surrounding SB88 continue, it is crucial to keep an open dialogue that respects diverse perspectives while prioritizing the well-being and parental involvement in the lives of our children.
Get Right4 months ago
BREAKING: Are Flu Shots Harming The Elderly?
Did You See This?7 months ago
Challenging Mainstream Narratives: Unpacking the Latest Nonsense Study on ‘Top Surgery’
Did You See This?6 months ago
WOW! Did A Federal Court Just Admit They Unfairly Targeted Pro-Lifers?
Raising Them Right6 months ago
BREAKING: CNN Host Grills Fauci on Mask Lies – You Won’t Believe His Response
Did You See This?6 months ago
New Research Exposes Alarming Connection Between Abortion and Mental Health
Did You See This?6 months ago
BREAKING: Are We Really Going To FORCE KIDS To Wear Masks Again?
Did You See This?6 months ago
BREAKING: Did Barack Obama Really Smoke Crack and Engage in Same-Sex Relations?
Did You See This?7 months ago
Exciting News About Parents’ Rights! New Bill Puts Parents in the Know