Connect with us

Did You See This?

Mama Bears Unleashed: The Impact of Conservative Moms on Presidential Primaries

“I proudly identify as a mama bear, and I can tell you that this movement is really powerful and inspiring.”

Published

on

In the middle of all the election excitement, we often come up with catchy names for groups of voters who have a big say in shaping the future. Remember terms like soccer moms, security moms, and NASCAR dads? Well, now there’s a new group called the “mama bears.”

I proudly identify as a mama bear, and I can tell you that this movement is really powerful and inspiring. We, as conservative moms and grandmas, have joined forces under the idea of “parental rights,” standing up passionately for what we believe in. One of our key concerns is about talking about gender identity in school lessons. It’s nice to see that even though some people have unfairly called us extremists, we’re catching people’s attention because of our unity and commitment. Despite these misunderstandings, our impact is strong, and we’re becoming important voters in the 2024 Republican presidential primary.

What’s really cool is that our hard work is getting noticed. Even Donald Trump himself recognized us, saying that groups like Moms for Liberty are teaching the liberal left a lesson: “Don’t underestimate America’s moms.” Ron DeSantis also got it right when he said the recent “woke” policies unintentionally woke up a powerful political force: us mama bears. It’s awesome to know that our voices are being heard and making a difference.

One person who really speaks to us is Casey DeSantis. She started the initiative “Mamas for DeSantis” from early-voting Iowa. She gives credit to moms and grandmas like us for her husband’s success as Florida’s governor, securing a second term. Casey believes we’ll have the same impact as her husband runs for president, and that’s really encouraging.

In one of her recent talks, Casey DeSantis shared funny stories about raising her kids in the governor’s house – like tales of slime accidents and crayon drawings on the walls. Her words meant a lot to me and other mama bears when she said, “When policies start affecting us as mothers, it’s concerning. But when those policies put our children at risk, our strong protection instincts kick in.”

The mama bears are an amazing group that stretches across the country, bringing together conservative women from all different backgrounds. Many of us are white, and some are part of well-known groups like Moms for Liberty, which has a big membership of 120,000 people all over the country. Others, like me, stick to our own beliefs and principles.

We became well-known during the COVID-19 pandemic, when we got a closer look at what our kids were learning. Our numbers grew because we were worried about the government going too far and about policies that didn’t sit right with us. This happened especially after Joe Biden won against Trump in 2020.

So, we stood against schools closing due to the pandemic and against rules about wearing masks. We also argued against programs in schools that talked about things like fairness and diversity, and we pushed to get rid of books we didn’t agree with, like ones that talked about LGBTQ topics. We went to a lot of meetings where school decisions are made, like school board meetings, and we strongly said we didn’t want certain things taught to our kids. Some of us even became candidates for school boards ourselves to support our beliefs.

Many mamas didn’t really care about politics until the pandemic happened. That’s when we first got frustrated about wearing masks and doing school online for our kindergarteners and started asking questions because we were NOT happy with the answers.

And then, when our schools allowed transgender students to use bathrooms based on their chosen gender, a lot of us decided to do something. We took our kids out of public school and started groups like Moms for Liberty started popping up all over the country. Seeing other moms get involved in politics was really encouraging for all of us.

Like Geralyn, the founder of Moms for Liberty, I also supported Trump in 2016 and 2020. It’s amazing to see that he, along with many other 2024 candidates, wanted to talk to Moms for Liberty and moms like me. We had meetings where we all talked, and there were always more people wanting to join than there were spots available.

With a lot of confidence, Geralyn said, “I really believe we’ll be the voice that everyone wants to hear in the next election.”

The Mamas for DeSantis event was really heartwarming. There were games for kids, and parents talked about important things. Parents held their little ones close, showing how family is a big deal for us. The DeSantis campaign even made shirts and bags that say “Mamas for DeSantis” to help spread our message.

Did You See This?

YIKES! This Transgender Breastfeeding Story Is TOO WILD To Even Believe

Published

on

In a shocking and deeply concerning revelation, a transgender biological man with HIV, Murray Pearson, has been actively “breastfeeding” his infant, despite the inherent risk of HIV transmission. What makes this situation even more alarming is the involvement of Canadian doctors who are aiding and abetting this dangerous behavior.

Pearson, who identifies as a woman and goes by the name Margie Fancypants on social media, began his transition in 2022, taking drugs to induce lactation. His journey has been documented on a Reddit forum for transgenders, where he openly discusses his desire to “connect through feeding” his 9-month-old baby. The details of his actions are nothing short of horrifying.

Acknowledging his HIV positive status, Pearson admits that the transmission of the virus to his infant through breast milk is a distinct possibility if his viral load becomes detectable. Viral load refers to the amount of HIV in the blood at a given time. While he plans to monitor his viral load monthly to purportedly “mitigate the risk,” the question remains: why expose the child to any risk in the first place?

The nonchalant use of the term “mitigate risk” in this context is both alarming and irresponsible. The safety and well-being of the infant should be the paramount concern. Why not eliminate the risk entirely by choosing not to expose the child to potential HIV transmission?

One of Pearson’s doctors, Dr. Marina Klein, attempts to justify the situation by stating, “It’s important to emphasize that we do not recommend breastfeeding for people with HIV… [however] If, after informed discussion, a person expresses a wish to breastfeed they may choose to do so provided they are willing to follow a close protocol of viral monitoring.” This raises serious ethical questions about the medical community’s role in enabling such risky choices.

We cannot turn a blind eye to the fact that a child’s health is being compromised for the sake of someone’s personal desires. The decision to breastfeed, despite the potential transmission of a life-altering virus, is simply unacceptable. It is crucial for society to speak out against such actions that put innocent lives at risk.

This disturbing scenario demands not only public awareness but also a reevaluation of medical ethics. The welfare of children must always take precedence over individual choices, especially when those choices can have severe consequences. As we contemplate this distressing situation, our thoughts and prayers go out to the vulnerable infant caught in the midst of this perilous circumstance.

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

Gemini Gate: Learn All About Google’s WOKE AI Disaster

Published

on

In a recent controversy, Google’s artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, Gemini, faced backlash for its image generation tool, which displayed blatant racial bias against white individuals. This incident has ignited concerns about the extent to which Google’s AI algorithms may be influenced by a perceived “woke” ideology.

Gemini, essentially Google’s counterpart to ChatGPT, utilizes AI to generate human-like prompts for various purposes, including writing essays, web code, and, most recently, creating images. However, the tool faced significant criticism when users discovered instances of racial bias in its depictions of historical figures.

Historical figures, including the Founding Fathers, Vikings, and the Pope, were portrayed in a way that seemed to intentionally invert their actual racial identities. The Founding Fathers were depicted as black, Vikings as black and Asian, and the Pope as a black man and an Indian woman. This sparked outrage on social media, prompting Google to take down the image-generation tool and issue an apology, acknowledging that they “got it wrong.”

In their apology, Google hinted at the incorporation of racial “equity” in their strategy, stating that media representation has historically favored white individuals and their achievements. They suggested that focusing solely on white individuals risks perpetuating this imbalance. While acknowledging the need for diverse representation is crucial, the incident raises concerns about the potential bias and lack of nuance in Google’s AI algorithms.

Conservatives and independents have long expressed apprehensions about Google’s left-wing and perceived anti-white bias, particularly in its search tool. This incident adds to a growing list of instances that amplify these concerns. Critics argue that Google’s commitment to diversity and equity may be pushing their AI algorithms towards producing content that is not only inaccurate but also reflects a biased narrative.

Federalist founder Sean Davis pointed out the broader issue, stating, “The purpose of a system is what it produces. Google exists to produce lies and manipulate minds in service of a left-wing ideological agenda.” This sentiment reflects the worry that Google’s AI algorithms may be overly influenced by ideological considerations, compromising their ability to provide objective and unbiased information.

As technology continues to play an integral role in shaping our understanding of the world, it is crucial to hold AI developers accountable for ensuring fairness, accuracy, and impartiality. The Gemini incident serves as a reminder that as AI becomes more sophisticated, the potential for unintended biases and the amplification of certain ideologies also increases. Striking a balance between promoting diversity and avoiding bias is a delicate task that requires continuous scrutiny and improvement in AI development processes.

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

Joe Biden’s Open Borders Endangering American Lives: The Tragic Case of Laken Riley

Published

on

As a concerned parent, I find myself grappling with a sense of profound grief and anger over the tragic murder of 22-year-old University of Georgia nursing student Laken Riley. Her life was cut short in a brutal act of violence that serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of lax immigration policies, particularly the open-border approach championed by President Joe Biden and his administration.

The man charged with this heinous crime is Jose Antonio Ibarra, a Venezuelan national who entered the U.S. illegally in 2022 by crossing the southern border in Texas. Shockingly, this was not Ibarra’s first encounter with law enforcement. In the preceding year, he had been arrested in New York for endangering a 5-year-old child. However, the New York Police Department inexplicably released him before Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) could take appropriate action.

Tragically, this decision had devastating consequences. Last Thursday, Laken Riley went missing after going for a jog on a trail at the University of Georgia. Her lifeless body was discovered in a wooded area off the trail, with law enforcement describing the murder as “a crime of opportunity.” Ibarra has been charged with a litany of serious offenses, including malice murder, felony murder, aggravated battery, aggravated assault, false imprisonment, kidnapping, hindering a 911 call, and concealing the death of another.

What compounds the tragedy is the fact that Athens-Clarke County, where this gruesome murder occurred, is one of four sanctuary cities in Georgia. Sanctuary policies limit cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities, creating an environment where individuals like Ibarra can slip through the cracks and pose a grave danger to the community.

Equally disturbing is the media’s coverage of this heartbreaking incident. The Associated Press, in its reporting, highlighted the “dangers for female joggers” but glaringly omitted any mention that Laken Riley’s killer was an illegal alien who had previously been arrested. This type of selective reporting only serves to obscure the broader issue at hand and contributes to a lack of transparency about the real dangers posed by individuals entering the country illegally.

In the bigger picture, Laken Riley’s blood is on the hands of Joe Biden and every open-border Democrat. Since Biden took office, over 10 million illegal immigrants have been allowed to enter the United States. This staggering number underscores the urgency of reevaluating our immigration policies and addressing the inherent risks associated with an open-border approach.

The safety and well-being of American citizens must be the top priority. It is high time for our leaders to acknowledge the devastating consequences of their policies and take concrete actions to protect the lives of individuals like Laken Riley, who should never have fallen victim to a system that failed to prioritize the safety and security of its own citizens.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.