Connect with us

Did You See This?

Celebrating Compassion and Life: Nebraska’s Ruling on Protecting the Unborn and Minors

This crucial measure prevents minors from undergoing life-altering surgeries while also addressing transgender drug regulations, a significant stride towards protecting vulnerable youth and acknowledging preborn babies’ rights by prohibiting elective abortions beyond 12 weeks.

Published

on

Nebraska has taken a strong stance in upholding the sanctity of life and safeguarding the well-being of minors. A recent decision by District Court Judge Lori Maret has given a nod of approval to Legislative Bill 574, a vital measure that prevents minors from undergoing gender-altering surgeries like mastectomies and genital procedures. The bill also tasks Dr. Timothy Tesmer, the esteemed appointee of Governor Jim Pillen, to establish regulations pertaining to transgender drugs.

This legislation is a significant step towards protecting the vulnerable, with a few exceptions made to cater to gender-confused teens who are already using unscientific and risky drugs. Moreover, the bill rightly acknowledges the rights of preborn babies, prohibiting elective abortions beyond 12 weeks of gestation.

Judge Maret’s ruling on August 11th also dismissed Planned Parenthood’s medical officer, Dr. Sarah Traxler, from the case, deeming her claim of potential harm as “speculative.” While an appeal is expected, the laws can be enforced as the case unfolds.

Planned Parenthood, joined by the ACLU, had sought to block this legislation, arguing that it violated the state constitution’s single-issue requirement. However, they conceded that the law comprehensively addresses healthcare matters.

Planned Parenthood’s motivation to oppose this law stems from its financial stake in abortion. The court acknowledged that the organization could suffer “direct economic injury” if unable to perform abortions. On the other hand, Dr. Traxler’s argument for standing was not substantiated, as she failed to prove her involvement in performing abortions beyond the 12-week mark.

It’s important to note that while this law won’t completely eradicate abortion in Nebraska, it could spare several hundred innocent lives, as highlighted in the state’s 2021 abortion report.

Governor Pillen lauded the ruling, expressing gratitude for the comprehensive decision. He hailed the measure for its commitment to safeguarding children and preserving the unborn.

Planned Parenthood, on the contrary, found the ruling “infuriating.” Their CEO, Ruth Richardson, labeled it a blow to Nebraskans’ rights, especially those in marginalized communities. While the restrictions remain in place, Planned Parenthood remains determined to support the abortion cause.

Adam Schwend, the Western Regional Director of SBA Pro-Life America, celebrated the decision while emphasizing the ongoing battle for life. The “Let Them Grow Act” is expected to make a substantial impact, saving countless lives by curbing painful abortions beyond 12 weeks. Schwend commended Judge Maret for prioritizing the will of the people over the abortion lobby’s interests.

While the journey for the rights of unborn children and their mothers is far from over, Schwend remains confident that the compassion and wisdom of Nebraskans will prevail.

The origins of this law trace back to a broader six-week abortion ban that faced opposition. A liberal Republican, along with pro-abortion Democrats, halted the legislation. Despite this setback, the spirit of protecting life endures, and we must embrace a future that respects the rights of the unborn.

Did You See This?

Can America Afford To Ignore The Israel-Hamas CRISIS?

Published

on

There’s a lot to be said about America First, but can we really ignore what’s happening in Israel right now? Maybe not.

WATCH:

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

BREAKING: Do These Pro-Palestine Americans Even Know What They’re Talking About?!

Published

on

It’s tragic that these kids truly don’t understand what they’re protesting. Watch this beauty queen SCHOOL them on the basic facts of the Israel-Palestine conflict.

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

YIKES! This Transgender Breastfeeding Story Is TOO WILD To Even Believe

Published

on

In a shocking and deeply concerning revelation, a transgender biological man with HIV, Murray Pearson, has been actively “breastfeeding” his infant, despite the inherent risk of HIV transmission. What makes this situation even more alarming is the involvement of Canadian doctors who are aiding and abetting this dangerous behavior.

Pearson, who identifies as a woman and goes by the name Margie Fancypants on social media, began his transition in 2022, taking drugs to induce lactation. His journey has been documented on a Reddit forum for transgenders, where he openly discusses his desire to “connect through feeding” his 9-month-old baby. The details of his actions are nothing short of horrifying.

Acknowledging his HIV positive status, Pearson admits that the transmission of the virus to his infant through breast milk is a distinct possibility if his viral load becomes detectable. Viral load refers to the amount of HIV in the blood at a given time. While he plans to monitor his viral load monthly to purportedly “mitigate the risk,” the question remains: why expose the child to any risk in the first place?

The nonchalant use of the term “mitigate risk” in this context is both alarming and irresponsible. The safety and well-being of the infant should be the paramount concern. Why not eliminate the risk entirely by choosing not to expose the child to potential HIV transmission?

One of Pearson’s doctors, Dr. Marina Klein, attempts to justify the situation by stating, “It’s important to emphasize that we do not recommend breastfeeding for people with HIV… [however] If, after informed discussion, a person expresses a wish to breastfeed they may choose to do so provided they are willing to follow a close protocol of viral monitoring.” This raises serious ethical questions about the medical community’s role in enabling such risky choices.

We cannot turn a blind eye to the fact that a child’s health is being compromised for the sake of someone’s personal desires. The decision to breastfeed, despite the potential transmission of a life-altering virus, is simply unacceptable. It is crucial for society to speak out against such actions that put innocent lives at risk.

This disturbing scenario demands not only public awareness but also a reevaluation of medical ethics. The welfare of children must always take precedence over individual choices, especially when those choices can have severe consequences. As we contemplate this distressing situation, our thoughts and prayers go out to the vulnerable infant caught in the midst of this perilous circumstance.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.