Connect with us

Raising Them Right

BREAKING: Washington National Cathedral’s New WOKE Windows Spark Outrage!



I can’t help but feel deeply troubled by the news of the Washington National Cathedral unveiling its new racial-justice-themed stained glass windows. The decision to replace the previous depictions of Confederate generals Robert E. Lee and Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson is one that I find deeply unsettling.

The Cathedral argues that these new windows, titled “Now and Forever,” are meant to depict protestors holding placards with messages like “no foul play” and “fairness.” They claim this is a symbol of a “new chapter” in the monument’s artistic and architectural legacy. While I am all for promoting justice and fairness, I can’t help but question the necessity of replacing historical depictions with what appears to be a heavy-handed political message.

The previous stained glass windows of Generals Lee and Jackson were deemed “offensive” and “a barrier to the ministry of this cathedral.” This statement from the Very Rev. Randolph Marshall Hollerith troubles me even more. These men, flawed as they may have been, were part of our nation’s history. Are we now going to erase all aspects of our history that make us uncomfortable?

Rev. Hollerith’s comments about recommitting the Cathedral to “fairness for all Americans, but especially for African Americans” are noble, but I worry that this approach of erasing the past in the name of progress is shortsighted. Yes, there is much work to be done to confront systemic racism and foster racial reconciliation, but we should do so through dialogue, understanding, and education, not by simply removing historical figures from view.

The artist responsible for these windows, Kerry James Marshall, compared the Biblical fall of humanity with the creation of America. While I respect his perspective, I can’t help but feel that this is a misguided attempt to equate the past with the present. America’s history is complex, filled with both triumphs and failures, and we must acknowledge and learn from it rather than replace it with symbols that may be politically fashionable today.

Furthermore, it’s concerning to see the involvement of foundations like the Ford Foundation, the Mellon Foundation, and Steven Spielberg’s Heartland Foundation in supporting this project. It raises questions about the motivations behind such a drastic change in the Cathedral’s artwork.

In conclusion, while I believe in the importance of addressing racial injustice and promoting fairness for all, I am disappointed by the Washington National Cathedral’s decision to replace its stained glass windows. As a Catholic mom, I believe that preserving our history and engaging in meaningful conversations about it is essential for our growth as a nation. Erasing the past does not lead to true progress; it only serves to obscure our shared history and the lessons it can teach us.

Continue Reading

Raising Them Right

ARE YOU SERIOUS!? Kids Pledge Allegiance to Gay Pride Flag



The gay agenda has been after kids and this video of Pete Buttigeig’s husband proves it.


Continue Reading

Raising Them Right

Shocking Realities of Youth Transgender Healthcare – It Is WORSE Than We Thought!



In a shocking revelation, Environmental Progress recently obtained leaked documents from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), shedding light on the disturbing and sinister reality of youth and adult transgender healthcare. The findings, published by the Daily Caller, uncover a troubling pseudoscience that has infiltrated American children’s lives, surpassing previous expectations.

WPATH’s Influence on Transgender Healthcare:

As the leading organization guiding doctors, hospitals, and clinics on transgender healthcare, WPATH holds significant influence in shaping medical practices for individuals with gender dysphoria. While just three years ago, the transgender craze was perceived as affecting a limited number of confused individuals, the rapid increase in self-identifications, particularly among young girls, has turned it into a widespread societal concern.

The Betrayal of Trust:

At the core of this issue lies the question of whether parents can trust the medical information provided by their doctors. The leaked documents make it abundantly clear that trust in the medical guidance offered by WPATH is misplaced. Shockingly, professionals in the field discussed the necessity of obtaining two authorization letters for the surgical removal of a minor girl’s breasts, dismissing concerns as “gatekeeping.”

Informed Consent and Unproven Science:

The documents reveal a consensus among the world’s top minds in transgender medicine that minors cannot provide informed consent for hormone blockers, cross-sex hormones, or surgeries altering healthy sex organs. This raises concerns about parents lacking the biological knowledge necessary to make informed decisions for their children’s healthcare.

Progressive Activism and Parental Rights:

The attack on parental protections becomes apparent, with progressive activists pushing for policies that separate children from parents who refuse to conform to the “affirmation” model. Parents seeking alternatives may face accusations of abuse, further limiting their ability to make decisions in the best interest of their children.

Misleading Information on Reversibility:

For a significant period, the medical community portrayed hormone blockers and hormonal treatments as reversible or non-permanent solutions. However, the report exposes the falsehood of these claims, revealing lifelong complications such as infertility, lack of orgasm, and an increased risk of developing cancerous masses.

Hidden Dangers of Cross-Sex Hormones:

The WPATH Files detail the dangers of cross-sex hormones, including pelvic inflammatory disease, cardiovascular issues, and even death. Medical professionals recount cases of severe health complications linked to prolonged use of these hormones, highlighting the urgent need for a reassessment of current practices.


The shocking revelations within the WPATH Files showcase the alarming mistreatment of children in the name of transgender healthcare. The medical community’s obligation to “do no harm” is disregarded in this context, prompting a call for government investigations to ensure the safety and well-being of these vulnerable patients. It is essential to bring attention to these issues and work towards reforms that prioritize the health and future of the children affected by these controversial practices.

Continue Reading

Raising Them Right

SHOCKING: What Activists DON’T Want You to Know About Trans Suicide Rates



In a groundbreaking study led by Dr. Riittakerttu Kaltiala, a former advocate for gender-transition treatments, the mainstream narrative regarding the life-saving nature of such interventions for young people has been called into question. Contrary to popular belief, the study, based on health records from Finland’s national database, reveals that gender-transition treatments have no discernible impact on suicide rates among gender-distressed individuals. Instead, the research highlights a correlation between mental illness and suicide.

The Study Design

Dr. Kaltiala’s study analyzed the health records of 2,083 gender-distressed individuals, who sought assistance at gender clinics in Finland at an average age of 18. This group was tracked for approximately 7 years. To provide a comparative context, a control group of 17,000 individuals without gender-related concerns was also examined.

Surprising Findings

The study challenges the widely held belief that gender-transition treatments, including cross-sex hormones or surgeries, are “life-saving” for young people facing gender distress. While 38% of the gender-distressed group underwent such interventions, the suicide rate observed was just 0.3%, only marginally higher than the 0.1% rate in the control group. The study categorizes both rates as “unusual events,” casting doubt on the notion that gender-transition treatments significantly impact suicide prevention.

Questioning Ethical Standards

Dr. Kaltiala criticized the common practice of gender clinics posing questions to parents such as, “Would you rather have a living son or a dead daughter?” She labeled this approach as “most unethical” and emphasized that it is not grounded in factual evidence. The study suggests a need for a more nuanced and evidence-based dialogue around gender-transition treatments.

Mental Health Correlation

While the study did not find a direct link between gender-transition treatments and suicide rates, it did unveil a “statistically significant relationship” between a high prevalence of co-occurring mental health difficulties and increased suicide risk. This highlights the importance of addressing mental health concerns in conjunction with gender-related issues.

Implications and Contradictions

The research challenges the radical left-wing narrative that has been promulgated by certain medical and LGBTQ groups, claiming that the “science is settled” regarding the life-saving nature of gender-transition treatments. The study’s findings suggest a need for a more nuanced and evidence-based understanding of the complex relationship between gender dysphoria, mental health, and suicide risk.


Dr. Kaltiala’s study presents a significant challenge to the prevailing narrative surrounding gender-transition treatments and their purported life-saving impact on young people. By questioning the ethical standards of communication within gender clinics and highlighting the correlation between mental health difficulties and suicide risk, the research calls for a more informed and balanced approach to discussions on gender-related interventions.

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.