Riley Gaines, a former All-American swimmer, and devoted conservative activist, took to social media to address a concerning situation involving Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and an individual who identifies as transgender.
In a heartfelt video shared on X (formerly Twitter), Gaines expressed her concerns about the recent events.
She rightfully criticized Trudeau’s stance and questioned the impact of his policies on women’s sports. She began by shedding light on a recent occurrence in the world of Canadian powerlifting—a new national record was set, but the record holder was not, in fact, a woman.
Gaines, a passionate advocate for women’s sports, believes that there is a unique strength and spirit in female athletes. Her focus is on promoting fairness in sports and preserving the essence of competition that separates male and female athletes based on biological realities. She believes that the inclusion of biological males in women’s sports could undermine the very essence of what makes women’s athletics special.
The focus of Gaines’ concern was a gender-confused individual named “Anne” Andres, aged 40. This individual had recently set a new Canadian powerlifting record in the Female Masters Unequipped category. While their feat is impressive, Gaines drew attention to the inherent physical differences between biological males and females. Andres’ achievement, while notable, was ultimately facilitated by the advantages of male puberty and testosterone levels.
In her video, Gaines highlighted the purpose of women’s sports—celebrating the unique physical capabilities of women. She expressed her belief that women deserve recognition and celebration for their achievements, while also acknowledging the distinctiveness that sets them apart from their male counterparts. Women’s sports categories were established to provide a level playing field for female athletes, allowing them to thrive within their own boundaries.
April Hutchinson, a Canadian competitive powerlifter, expressed her gratitude towards Gaines for speaking out against the participation of biological males in women’s sports. She echoed the sentiment that maintaining the fairness and authenticity of women’s athletics is crucial to upholding the integrity of the sport itself.
It’s important to note that scientific research consistently supports the idea that biological differences play a significant role in sports performance. Male and female bodies possess distinct physical capabilities that persist even with the use of cross-sex hormones. Organizations like World Track and Field have taken steps to uphold fairness by ensuring that competitors participate in categories aligned with their biological sex.
In conclusion, Riley Gaines’ unwavering dedication to preserving the essence of women’s athletics is commendable. Her advocacy for fairness, authenticity, and the celebration of women’s unique physical capabilities is a crucial aspect of maintaining the integrity of sports. As we move forward, let’s continue to support women’s sports and ensure that they remain a testament to the strength and determination of female athletes.
SHOCKING: What Activists DON’T Want You to Know About Trans Suicide Rates
In a groundbreaking study led by Dr. Riittakerttu Kaltiala, a former advocate for gender-transition treatments, the mainstream narrative regarding the life-saving nature of such interventions for young people has been called into question. Contrary to popular belief, the study, based on health records from Finland’s national database, reveals that gender-transition treatments have no discernible impact on suicide rates among gender-distressed individuals. Instead, the research highlights a correlation between mental illness and suicide.
The Study Design
Dr. Kaltiala’s study analyzed the health records of 2,083 gender-distressed individuals, who sought assistance at gender clinics in Finland at an average age of 18. This group was tracked for approximately 7 years. To provide a comparative context, a control group of 17,000 individuals without gender-related concerns was also examined.
The study challenges the widely held belief that gender-transition treatments, including cross-sex hormones or surgeries, are “life-saving” for young people facing gender distress. While 38% of the gender-distressed group underwent such interventions, the suicide rate observed was just 0.3%, only marginally higher than the 0.1% rate in the control group. The study categorizes both rates as “unusual events,” casting doubt on the notion that gender-transition treatments significantly impact suicide prevention.
Questioning Ethical Standards
Dr. Kaltiala criticized the common practice of gender clinics posing questions to parents such as, “Would you rather have a living son or a dead daughter?” She labeled this approach as “most unethical” and emphasized that it is not grounded in factual evidence. The study suggests a need for a more nuanced and evidence-based dialogue around gender-transition treatments.
Mental Health Correlation
While the study did not find a direct link between gender-transition treatments and suicide rates, it did unveil a “statistically significant relationship” between a high prevalence of co-occurring mental health difficulties and increased suicide risk. This highlights the importance of addressing mental health concerns in conjunction with gender-related issues.
Implications and Contradictions
The research challenges the radical left-wing narrative that has been promulgated by certain medical and LGBTQ groups, claiming that the “science is settled” regarding the life-saving nature of gender-transition treatments. The study’s findings suggest a need for a more nuanced and evidence-based understanding of the complex relationship between gender dysphoria, mental health, and suicide risk.
Dr. Kaltiala’s study presents a significant challenge to the prevailing narrative surrounding gender-transition treatments and their purported life-saving impact on young people. By questioning the ethical standards of communication within gender clinics and highlighting the correlation between mental health difficulties and suicide risk, the research calls for a more informed and balanced approach to discussions on gender-related interventions.
ARE THEY FINALLY GETTING IT? Dems Worry Biden Is Too Old
A recent report has highlighted growing concerns among Democrats about President Joe Biden’s use of notecards during closed-door fundraisers and calls with prescreened donors. The worries primarily revolve around questions about the president’s age and ability to handle the demands of an extended presidential campaign or potential debates with rivals.
According to Axios, President Biden, who is 81 years old, uses notecards, even during staged sessions with donors. While Biden’s advisers argue that the notecards are employed for addressing detailed and technical questions, some donors are skeptical, questioning whether he can endure the pressures of a rigorous campaign or debates, particularly against former President Donald Trump, who is four years younger at 77.
Unlike several recent presidents, including Trump, who have used teleprompters or crib notes in public events, donors have noted that Biden is also relying on notecards during private conversations with donors. This has fueled concerns among some contributors, who wonder if this practice reflects a potential struggle with the stresses of the presidential race.
The Biden campaign has dismissed these concerns, emphasizing the importance of focusing on issues that matter to the American people in the upcoming 2024 election. Biden campaign spokesperson Kevin Munoz addressed the worries, pointing to a recent court ruling in Alabama regarding frozen embryos as an example of “news that matters.”
Axios reports that Biden’s use of notecards is part of a strategic approach by his staff to ensure the success of his fundraisers. The president’s packed schedule has provided his campaign and the Democratic National Committee with a substantial financial advantage leading up to the November election. Biden, drawing on his extensive experience in politics, also expects thorough preparation for his meetings.
While some donors argue that Biden has always been an off-the-cuff speaker, citing his ability to provide spontaneous answers during discussions, others are concerned about the recent report from Robert Hur, the special counsel in Biden’s documents investigation. Hur described the president as a “well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” raising further questions about Biden’s fitness for the presidency.
Adding to the concerns, a Quinnipiac University poll released this week indicates that two-thirds of voters believe Biden is too old to serve as president. In contrast, 41% of respondents think Trump is too old. This public sentiment may further contribute to the unease among Democrats regarding Biden’s candidacy.
As the 2024 election approaches, Democrats are grappling with concerns over President Biden’s use of notecards and its implications for his ability to navigate the demands of a campaign. The mixed views on his speaking style, coupled with public perceptions reflected in polls, create a challenging landscape for the Democratic Party as they assess the viability of Biden’s candidacy.
BREAKING: Dr. Phil Boldly Speaks Out Against Rushed Approvals for Child “Gender-Affirming Care
In a recent appearance on “The Joe Rogan Experience,” former daytime TV talk show host Dr. Phil McGraw fearlessly criticized major medical associations for endorsing child “gender-affirming care” without sufficient research. Dr. Phil questioned the hasty approval of procedures like sex reassignment surgery and hormone therapy for children, emphasizing the lack of comprehensive studies on potential long-term harm.
Expressing his concerns, Dr. Phil highlighted the use of terms like ‘gender-affirming care’ as a clever way to camouflage what essentially involves invasive medical interventions on minors. He specifically called out organizations such as the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American Endocrine Society for providing their endorsement without a thorough examination of the potential risks.
“I have never seen those organizations sign off on anything with less information as to whether or not it does long-term harm, of anything in my life,” Dr. Phil remarked, emphasizing the importance of the medical community adhering to the principle of “first do no harm.”
Dr. Phil drew attention to the decisions made by European countries, including Sweden and Norway, which halted “gender-affirming care” for children in 2022. Citing the European countries’ conscientious objection to endorsing procedures lacking concrete evidence of benefits, Dr. Phil underlined the ethical dilemma faced by medical professionals.
The conversation between Dr. Phil and Joe Rogan delved into the notion that raising concerns about the potential harm of these procedures often leads to being labeled as transphobic, inhibiting open discussions on the topic. Dr. Phil stressed the importance of acknowledging the real and complex issues associated with gender dysphoria, rather than relying on unproven methods that may not address the root causes.
The World Health Organization’s decision not to issue recommendations on “gender-affirming care” for children and adolescents under 20 years old, due to a lack of scientific literature, further supports Dr. Phil’s argument. This cautious approach aligns with the stance taken by European countries that have halted such interventions until more conclusive evidence is available.
In conclusion, Dr. Phil’s bold stance against the rushed approval of child “gender-affirming care” serves as a call for more critical evaluation within the medical community. As he promises to showcase the real results of these interventions in upcoming shows, Dr. Phil urges society to question the motives behind these endorsements and advocates for a more measured and responsible approach to the well-being of young individuals grappling with issues of gender identity.
Get Right4 months ago
BREAKING: Are Flu Shots Harming The Elderly?
Did You See This?7 months ago
Challenging Mainstream Narratives: Unpacking the Latest Nonsense Study on ‘Top Surgery’
Raising Them Right6 months ago
BREAKING: CNN Host Grills Fauci on Mask Lies – You Won’t Believe His Response
Did You See This?7 months ago
WOW! Did A Federal Court Just Admit They Unfairly Targeted Pro-Lifers?
Did You See This?7 months ago
New Research Exposes Alarming Connection Between Abortion and Mental Health
Did You See This?6 months ago
BREAKING: Are We Really Going To FORCE KIDS To Wear Masks Again?
Did You See This?6 months ago
BREAKING: Did Barack Obama Really Smoke Crack and Engage in Same-Sex Relations?
Did You See This?7 months ago
Exciting News About Parents’ Rights! New Bill Puts Parents in the Know