Connect with us

Did You See This?

WOW! The Dark Truth About the Federal ‘Vaccines for Children’ Program



Today, we’re diving into a vital topic that directly impacts the health and well-being of our families. It’s all about the Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution and how it relates to our ability to make informed choices regarding our children’s healthcare.

As the Federation of State Medical Boards points out, the Tenth Amendment empowers our states to create laws and regulations that safeguard the health, safety, and overall welfare of our citizens. We firmly believe that parents are the ultimate decision-makers when it comes to their children’s health.

The Federation emphasizes that practicing medicine is a privilege, granted by the people of each state through their elected representatives. These elected officials enact laws and regulations that govern the practice of medicine, as outlined in a state statute, often known as a Medical Practice Act.

Now, you may be wondering why we’re discussing this in the context of a “Mom Blog.” Well, just like our authority in education and other aspects of our lives, the federal government sometimes seeks to overstep its bounds and infringe upon our state’s rights, and consequently, our parental rights.

One of the tactics employed by the federal government to exert control is the allocation of tax dollars. They receive income from the states and their citizens, redistributing a fraction of those funds back as part of various federal programs. However, accepting these funds also means accepting the accompanying obligations. This brings us to the federal “Vaccines for Children” program, administered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The CDC explains that the VFC program aims to provide vaccines to children, ensuring that every child can receive their recommended vaccinations. While this may sound noble, the reality is that this program empowers the vaccine industry and allows the CDC to dictate national childhood vaccination practices.

The CDC’s recommendations significantly influence the standard of care for primary care physicians and pediatricians across the nation. Physicians who deviate from these recommendations may find themselves facing massive lawsuits, even for diseases like COVID.

But here’s the catch: COVID vaccines, like many others, do not provide complete protection. The data shows that after receiving a COVID booster shot, patients become more susceptible to the disease. These genetic “vaccines” don’t prevent infection, the development of COVID, transmission, hospitalization, or death.

However, following the ACIP’s recommendations and participating in the VFC program shields healthcare providers from malpractice lawsuits as long as they push these products on their patients. The childhood vaccination schedule is largely an educated guess, lacking solid clinical study data to support its safety and effectiveness.

Now, let’s discuss a recent development in New York. Primary care providers who participate in the VFC program have been informed that they must not only obtain COVID booster vaccines but also keep a stock of them. Failure to comply may result in being contacted regarding non-compliance with VFC requirements.

This raises the question: Should healthcare providers be forced to purchase and store these products, which may not be safe or effective, or risk their license to practice medicine?

In fact, the Federation of State Medical Boards warns that physicians spreading “misinformation or disinformation” about COVID vaccines could face disciplinary action, including the suspension or revocation of their medical license. This regulatory overreach infringes on the freedom of healthcare providers to speak their minds and advise patients as they see fit.

In conclusion, it’s important for us, as conservative moms, to understand the complexities of federal programs and their potential impact on our parental rights. The Tenth Amendment should remind us of our state’s right to regulate healthcare and protect our children’s well-being. Let’s stand up for our parental rights and make informed decisions that best serve our families.

Did You See This?

SHOCKING: Liberals In Virginia Said NO To This Porn Star Candidate!



In a recent election for Virginia’s House of Delegates, the Democratic candidate Susanna Gibson found herself in a steamy scandal that ultimately cost her the race. Let’s dive into the delightful details, shall we?

Gibson, a supposed champion of the Democratic Party, decided to make headlines of a rather salacious nature. She was caught red-handed uploading explicit videos of herself and her husband engaging in adult activities on a popular pornographic website, Chaturbate. Oh, how the mighty have fallen! The Washington Post uncovered this little gem of a story, and it spread like wildfire.

It’s a little ironic, don’t you think? Democrats often tout themselves as champions of women’s rights and defenders of morality, yet here was one of their own shamelessly peddling her intimacy for the sake of a few dollars from online viewers. I guess principles tend to fly out the window when there’s a quick buck to be made.

To add salt to the wound, several Democratic officials, who had initially endorsed Gibson’s candidacy, promptly distanced themselves from her after the scandal broke. It seems they didn’t want to be associated with the embarrassment, and who could blame them?

But hold onto your hats! Despite the explicit videos and the loss of endorsements, Gibson decided to keep campaigning. Her primary focus? Abortion. She accused Republican candidates of seeking to restrict the procedure unreasonably. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black! It’s hard not to roll your eyes at the sheer audacity of it all.

And what was the result, you may ask? Did the good people of Virginia stand with Gibson and her liberal virtue-signaling? Absolutely not! David Owen, the Republican candidate, emerged victorious by a slim margin of 966 votes. It’s almost as if the voters saw through the hypocrisy and chose a candidate who had his priorities straight.

In the end, despite Gibson’s best efforts, Democrats did manage to secure control of the House of Delegates and retained their grip on the state Senate. But it’s a Pyrrhic victory at best, especially when they had to carry the baggage of a candidate who brought shame to their party.

David Owen, the man of the hour, didn’t even stoop to using Gibson’s scandal as campaign material. He remained focused on the issues that truly matter to the people of Virginia. After his well-deserved victory, Owen expressed his readiness to work and serve the community. Now, that’s the kind of leadership Virginia needs!

In conclusion, Susanna Gibson’s fall from grace is a prime example of the hypocrisy that often runs rampant in liberal politics. It’s a cautionary tale for all those who prioritize virtue signaling over genuine principles. Virginia, like the rest of the country, deserves leaders who can walk the talk and focus on the real issues at hand. Congratulations to David Owen for his win, and may his tenure bring some much-needed sanity to the House of Delegates.

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

Demons in Children’s Books? Virginia Candidate Sparks Fury with ‘Demonic’ Literature!



In a shocking turn of events, Jeremy D. Rodden, a pro-LGBT candidate endorsed by the Virginia Democrat Party and running for the House of Delegates in the state’s conservative 90th District, is facing intense scrutiny and concern from concerned parents. The controversy centers around his associations with a satanic after-school group and his authorship of what are described as “demonic” children’s books, as reported by the Daily Wire.

Rodden, who has received strong backing from various leftist groups and individuals, is campaigning on an education-focused platform to unseat the Republican incumbent in the 90th District. However, his involvement with dark and troubling themes in his literature and his association with the After School Satan Club have raised significant alarms among parents, especially those of Catholic faith.

Some of Rodden’s books, including “UnCommon Evil” and “Demonic Household,” have ignited outrage among parents for their disturbing content. Concerned parents argue that these books are wholly inappropriate for children and go beyond what they consider acceptable boundaries for children’s literature.

Moreover, the controversy deepened when Rodden was found to be promoting an After School Satan Club at a local primary school. This development has added fuel to the fire, with parents expressing their profound disapproval of introducing such a group into their children’s educational environment. Many Catholic parents are particularly outraged, as they see it as a direct affront to their religious values and beliefs.

As the story continues to unfold, Jeremy D. Rodden’s campaign is now under intense scrutiny from concerned parents who fear that his associations with the satanic after-school group and the content of his “demonic” children’s books may have a detrimental impact on their children’s well-being and education. This controversy has brought to the forefront the ongoing debate about the role of education and the boundaries of expression in a politically charged environment.

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

BREAKING: The Real Reason Behind Jim Jordan’s Surprising Speaker Announcement



In a recent development that some may view as a strategic move by Congressman Jim Jordan, a staunch conservative and a favorite among many moms like myself, it appears that he has decided not to pursue a third run for the position of House Speaker. Instead, he has thrown his support behind Representative Patrick McHenry, whom he endorses as the Speaker Designee until at least January 2024. Jordan made this announcement following a closed-door meeting with his fellow GOP colleagues earlier today.

Jordan, faced two prior floor ballots earlier this week and unfortunately fell short of the required 217 votes. In the first round, he garnered the support of 200 of his fellow Republicans, and in the second round, only 199. On the other side of the aisle, Democrat Leader Hakeem Jeffries secured all 212 Democrat votes during both rounds of voting.

Interestingly, around 22 moderate Republican holdouts opted to cast their votes in an unpredictable manner, supporting various candidates, including former Speaker Kevin McCarthy, Iowa Representative Steve Scalise, and others. Their choices seemed to stem from their frustration with Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz, who played a role in ousting McCarthy earlier this month.

While Jordan had the endorsement of former President Donald Trump and even the support of McCarthy himself, he was perceived as the primary option for House Republicans. This was in part due to the withdrawal of Representative Scalise, the GOP’s Majority Leader, from the race, as he was unable to garner sufficient support from the more conservative members of the caucus.

Importantly, Jordan’s decision doesn’t rule out the possibility of him seeking the Speaker’s role in the future. It simply means that, for now, McHenry will step in as the “temporary Speaker” until a more permanent decision is made by Republicans. To ensure the House functions smoothly during this interim period, it appears that McHenry will need to be granted expanded powers, a move that lawmakers, including Jordan, are actively pursuing. However, it’s worth noting that Congressman Gaetz has voiced strong opposition to this approach, characterizing it as a “twisting” of the U.S. Constitution, and has called for the House to remain in session until a Speaker is officially selected. As conservative moms, we will be keeping a close eye on these developments and hoping for a swift and stable resolution in the best interests of our great nation.

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.