Connect with us

Raising Them Right

BREAKING: Texas AG Drops Bombshell Lawsuit Against Pfizer for Vaccine Deception



In a surprising turn of events, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has taken legal action against pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, accusing the company of misrepresenting the efficacy of its widely-used COVID-19 vaccine and suppressing public discourse surrounding it. The lawsuit, filed under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, claims that Pfizer utilized an unreliable method, known as “relative risk reduction,” to assert a 95% effectiveness for its vaccine. As the legal battle unfolds, a closer look reveals intriguing details about the controversy and its potential impact on public perception.

Paxton contends that Pfizer’s use of the “relative risk reduction” assessment method to claim a 95% effectiveness is a violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. This method, Paxton argues, could unduly influence patients and leave them vulnerable to making poor health decisions. The lawsuit further points to data suggesting that certain areas in the U.S. reported more COVID-linked deaths among vaccinated individuals than those who opted not to receive the vaccine.

In response to the allegations, Pfizer staunchly defends its claims, asserting that the representations made about its COVID-19 vaccine are accurate and science-based. Despite the legal scrutiny, the pharmaceutical giant has had a remarkably profitable year, with revenue soaring to an astounding $37.7 billion in 2022. This financial success adds an intriguing layer to the ongoing controversy, raising questions about the intersection of public health, corporate interests, and legal accountability.

Pfizer’s tremendous financial success in 2022, raking in $37.7 billion from its COVID-19 vaccine, spotlights the economic stakes in the pharmaceutical industry. The juxtaposition of legal action and financial prosperity prompts reflection on the broader dynamics at play. As the legal battle unfolds, the pharmaceutical industry’s influence on public health policies and the economic implications of vaccine distribution are under increased scrutiny.

Despite facing challenges from state legislators attempting to remove him, Attorney General Ken Paxton remains steadfast in his pursuit of justice. Paxton initiated the investigation into vaccine manufacturers earlier in the year, demonstrating his commitment to protecting citizens who may have been misled and harmed by Pfizer’s actions. The legal proceedings will likely shed light on the intricate balance between public health, corporate responsibility, and the role of government oversight.

The legal clash between Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and Pfizer unveils a complex web of allegations, financial interests, and public health concerns. As the legal battle progresses, it will be crucial to monitor how this controversy shapes public perception, influences future vaccine developments, and establishes precedents for corporate accountability. The intersection of science, commerce, and governance is at the heart of this unfolding narrative, emphasizing the need for transparency and ethical practices in the pharmaceutical industry.

Continue Reading

Raising Them Right

ARE YOU SERIOUS!? Kids Pledge Allegiance to Gay Pride Flag



The gay agenda has been after kids and this video of Pete Buttigeig’s husband proves it.


Continue Reading

Raising Them Right

Shocking Realities of Youth Transgender Healthcare – It Is WORSE Than We Thought!



In a shocking revelation, Environmental Progress recently obtained leaked documents from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), shedding light on the disturbing and sinister reality of youth and adult transgender healthcare. The findings, published by the Daily Caller, uncover a troubling pseudoscience that has infiltrated American children’s lives, surpassing previous expectations.

WPATH’s Influence on Transgender Healthcare:

As the leading organization guiding doctors, hospitals, and clinics on transgender healthcare, WPATH holds significant influence in shaping medical practices for individuals with gender dysphoria. While just three years ago, the transgender craze was perceived as affecting a limited number of confused individuals, the rapid increase in self-identifications, particularly among young girls, has turned it into a widespread societal concern.

The Betrayal of Trust:

At the core of this issue lies the question of whether parents can trust the medical information provided by their doctors. The leaked documents make it abundantly clear that trust in the medical guidance offered by WPATH is misplaced. Shockingly, professionals in the field discussed the necessity of obtaining two authorization letters for the surgical removal of a minor girl’s breasts, dismissing concerns as “gatekeeping.”

Informed Consent and Unproven Science:

The documents reveal a consensus among the world’s top minds in transgender medicine that minors cannot provide informed consent for hormone blockers, cross-sex hormones, or surgeries altering healthy sex organs. This raises concerns about parents lacking the biological knowledge necessary to make informed decisions for their children’s healthcare.

Progressive Activism and Parental Rights:

The attack on parental protections becomes apparent, with progressive activists pushing for policies that separate children from parents who refuse to conform to the “affirmation” model. Parents seeking alternatives may face accusations of abuse, further limiting their ability to make decisions in the best interest of their children.

Misleading Information on Reversibility:

For a significant period, the medical community portrayed hormone blockers and hormonal treatments as reversible or non-permanent solutions. However, the report exposes the falsehood of these claims, revealing lifelong complications such as infertility, lack of orgasm, and an increased risk of developing cancerous masses.

Hidden Dangers of Cross-Sex Hormones:

The WPATH Files detail the dangers of cross-sex hormones, including pelvic inflammatory disease, cardiovascular issues, and even death. Medical professionals recount cases of severe health complications linked to prolonged use of these hormones, highlighting the urgent need for a reassessment of current practices.


The shocking revelations within the WPATH Files showcase the alarming mistreatment of children in the name of transgender healthcare. The medical community’s obligation to “do no harm” is disregarded in this context, prompting a call for government investigations to ensure the safety and well-being of these vulnerable patients. It is essential to bring attention to these issues and work towards reforms that prioritize the health and future of the children affected by these controversial practices.

Continue Reading

Raising Them Right

SHOCKING: What Activists DON’T Want You to Know About Trans Suicide Rates



In a groundbreaking study led by Dr. Riittakerttu Kaltiala, a former advocate for gender-transition treatments, the mainstream narrative regarding the life-saving nature of such interventions for young people has been called into question. Contrary to popular belief, the study, based on health records from Finland’s national database, reveals that gender-transition treatments have no discernible impact on suicide rates among gender-distressed individuals. Instead, the research highlights a correlation between mental illness and suicide.

The Study Design

Dr. Kaltiala’s study analyzed the health records of 2,083 gender-distressed individuals, who sought assistance at gender clinics in Finland at an average age of 18. This group was tracked for approximately 7 years. To provide a comparative context, a control group of 17,000 individuals without gender-related concerns was also examined.

Surprising Findings

The study challenges the widely held belief that gender-transition treatments, including cross-sex hormones or surgeries, are “life-saving” for young people facing gender distress. While 38% of the gender-distressed group underwent such interventions, the suicide rate observed was just 0.3%, only marginally higher than the 0.1% rate in the control group. The study categorizes both rates as “unusual events,” casting doubt on the notion that gender-transition treatments significantly impact suicide prevention.

Questioning Ethical Standards

Dr. Kaltiala criticized the common practice of gender clinics posing questions to parents such as, “Would you rather have a living son or a dead daughter?” She labeled this approach as “most unethical” and emphasized that it is not grounded in factual evidence. The study suggests a need for a more nuanced and evidence-based dialogue around gender-transition treatments.

Mental Health Correlation

While the study did not find a direct link between gender-transition treatments and suicide rates, it did unveil a “statistically significant relationship” between a high prevalence of co-occurring mental health difficulties and increased suicide risk. This highlights the importance of addressing mental health concerns in conjunction with gender-related issues.

Implications and Contradictions

The research challenges the radical left-wing narrative that has been promulgated by certain medical and LGBTQ groups, claiming that the “science is settled” regarding the life-saving nature of gender-transition treatments. The study’s findings suggest a need for a more nuanced and evidence-based understanding of the complex relationship between gender dysphoria, mental health, and suicide risk.


Dr. Kaltiala’s study presents a significant challenge to the prevailing narrative surrounding gender-transition treatments and their purported life-saving impact on young people. By questioning the ethical standards of communication within gender clinics and highlighting the correlation between mental health difficulties and suicide risk, the research calls for a more informed and balanced approach to discussions on gender-related interventions.

Continue Reading


Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.