Connect with us

Did You See This?

Texas Governor Takes Bold Stand to Prevent Child ‘Gender Mutilation’ – Here’s What You Need to Know!

Published

on

I want to share the latest developments from the Texas Supreme Court. They have allowed a law to take effect that, in my opinion, aims to protect our children’s well-being. According to the Associated Press, this law prohibits minors from undergoing sex-change medical procedures while a lawsuit is ongoing.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) initiated a lawsuit against the state in July, arguing that this law “would ban necessary and life-saving medical care for Texas’s transgender youth” and were promptly granted an injunction. However, the state Supreme Court, in their recent ruling, has decided to keep this legislation in place while the lawsuit proceeds.

In a joint statement, the ACLU and legal advocates for the plaintiffs expressed their concerns, stating, “Transgender youth and their families are forced to confront the start of the school year fearful of what awaits them. But let us be clear: The fight is far from over,” as reported by the AP.

This law, known as Senate Bill 14, was signed into law by our Republican Governor, Greg Abbott, in June. It bars doctors from providing certain medical procedures, including orchiectomy, phalloplasty, and vaginoplasty, as well as hormones and puberty blockers, to minors. There is a limited exception for intersex children, according to the legislation. The bill also grants the state attorney general’s office the ability to take legal action if they believe a physician is violating the law.

Governor Abbott emphasized his perspective during the bill signing, stating, “We are now passing a law to ensure that going forward, no child will be victimized by gender mutilation. We should not allow sex organs of children to be cut off. That’s something that cannot be tolerated in this state,” as reported by the Houston Chronicle.

Brian Klosterboer, a staff attorney for the ACLU of Texas, has a different viewpoint. In a press release for the lawsuit, he stated, “The Texas Constitution forbids our state government from overriding the judgment of patients, their families, and their medical providers. S.B. 14 is a textbook example of discrimination since it bans evidence-based medical care for transgender youth while allowing any other young person in Texas to get the same treatment.”

In conclusion, this is a complex issue with passionate arguments on both sides. As a conservative mom, I believe it’s important to prioritize the well-being of all our children while respecting the principles of individual liberty and parental rights. It’s crucial for our society to find a balanced approach that ensures the best possible outcomes for our transgender youth while also addressing the concerns of those who believe in the importance of this new law.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Did You See This?

Pronoun Police Gone Too Far? Beloved 90 Year Old Volunteer PUNISHED & You Won’t Believe Why!

Published

on

In a shocking turn of events, 90-year-old Fran Itkoff, a dedicated volunteer for the National Multiple Sclerosis Society in California, has been dismissed from her role for allegedly not adhering to the organization’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) guidelines. The reason behind her dismissal? Failure to include pronouns in her email signature, a concept that left her genuinely confused.

Fran Itkoff’s story is not just about her recent dismissal; it’s a testament to a lifetime of selfless dedication. For an incredible 60 years, Itkoff volunteered with the MS Society, receiving numerous awards for her unwavering commitment. Her journey began as a response to her husband’s diagnosis with Multiple Sclerosis, a chronic autoimmune disease that affects the brain and spinal cord, leading to debilitating physical and cognitive impairments.

Itkoff’s dismissal centered around her alleged failure to comprehend and implement the organization’s DEI guidelines, specifically regarding the inclusion of gender pronouns in her email signature. Itkoff, when approached about the matter, expressed genuine confusion, stating, “I was confused. I didn’t know what it was and what it meant.” This confusion, stemming from a lack of understanding, raises questions about the appropriateness of dismissing someone who has dedicated their life to a cause.

Days after her supposed violation of DEI policies, Itkoff received a heart-wrenching email instructing her to “step down” from her volunteer position. The message read, “Unfortunately, based on the situation, we have made the difficult decision to have you step down from your volunteer position, effective immediately.” This decision, while purportedly rooted in a commitment to inclusivity, ironically excludes a 90-year-old disabled woman who has been an integral part of the organization for six decades.

Elle Hamilton, Itkoff’s daughter, aptly captures the irony of the situation. In a statement to Chaya Raichik (@LibsOfTikTok), Hamilton stated, “It’s ironic because they are saying they are inclusive, but they are excluding a 90-year-old disabled woman who has volunteered for 60 years.” Hamilton’s words resonate with the sense of injustice surrounding her mother’s dismissal, highlighting the apparent contradiction between the organization’s proclaimed values and their actions.

Fran Itkoff’s case is a poignant reminder of the potential pitfalls of overly rigid adherence to DEI guidelines. In the pursuit of inclusivity, it is crucial to consider the unique circumstances and contributions of individuals like Itkoff, who have devoted their lives to noble causes. It is high time for organizations to reevaluate their approach, ensuring that inclusivity is not achieved at the expense of the very individuals who have played an instrumental role in their success.

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

🚨 Shocking Revelation: 20 Million Illegals to Sway Elections! Will Your Vote Count?

Published

on

Recent warnings from immigration experts about the consequences of illegal immigration on House seats and Electoral College votes in upcoming elections have left me grappling with a sense of urgency to ensure my voice is heard.

The source of this concern stems from an executive order signed by President Joe Biden in 2021, mandating that the U.S. Census Bureau includes all residents, regardless of citizenship status, in its population count. While my sympathies lie with those seeking a better life in America, the potential political ramifications cannot be ignored.

According to a conservative estimate, approximately 16.8 million illegal aliens currently reside in the United States. Some argue that the actual number might be even higher, painting a worrisome picture for the future political landscape. When considering that the average House seat represents 761,168 residents, the inclusion of illegal immigrants could potentially account for 22 House seats, a significant number that may sway the balance in future elections.

The Electoral College, a crucial aspect of presidential elections, allocates votes to states based on their representation in the House. Consequently, states gaining additional House seats, such as New York due to its sanctuary city policies, would also gain extra Electoral College votes. This scenario, as pointed out by Mark Krikorian, the executive director at the Center for Immigration Studies, is deemed outrageous by many, as illegal immigrants were never intended to be included in the census count for apportionment purposes.

In response to these concerns, Republican lawmakers have introduced the Equal Representation Act, aimed at excluding non-citizens from the Census Bureau’s counts. However, the current political landscape, with a Democratic President and Senate, makes it unlikely for such legislation to pass.

Looking at the bigger picture, the next census is not scheduled until 2030, meaning the immediate impact may not affect the upcoming election. Nevertheless, the urgency to address this issue is undeniable. If left unattended, we risk granting political representation to roughly 20 million illegal immigrants, primarily concentrated in Democratic strongholds.

While I am sympathetic to all immigrants, I find myself torn between the desire to welcome those in search of a better life and the concern that our political system may be unduly influenced. While the Equal Representation Act may face challenges in the current political climate, concerned citizens must engage in dialogue, express their views, and actively participate in shaping the future of our nation. Ensuring fair and representative governance requires a delicate balance, one that recognizes the humanity of immigrants while preserving the integrity of our democratic processes.

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

BREAKING: Georgia Takes a Swipe at LGBT Agenda in Education – Find Out What They Did!

Published

on

HOORAY!

Georgia has become the latest states to pass legislation to protect kids from the LGBT agenda in our schools. The Georgia Senate’s Education & Youth Committee has taken a significant step by voting along party lines to advance SB88, also known as the Parents and Children Protection Act, aiming to regulate discussions on “gender identity” issues in private schools involving students younger than 16, without parental consent.

SB88 prohibits private schools from implementing any curriculum or instruction addressing issues related to gender identity, queer theory, gender ideology, or gender transition without first obtaining express written permission from each parent. This move is seen as a crucial step in ensuring that parents remain actively involved in sensitive and potentially life-changing discussions concerning their children.

Republican state Sen. Carden Summers, a key proponent of the bill, emphasized the importance of making the legislation fair while achieving the goal of involving parents in such crucial matters. This sentiment is shared by many who believe that parents should be the primary decision-makers when it comes to guiding their children through complex issues like gender identity.

Jeff Cleghorn, a gay former board member of Georgia Equality, expressed support for the bill, stating, “They are proselytizing this queer sexuality ideology to children. Activists in schools have no business interfering with the parent-child relationship. Do not let schools teach kids to keep secrets from their parents.”

However, not all social conservatives in Georgia are in complete agreement about the law’s ramifications. Some argue that SB88 is a flawed attempt to regulate private schools, introducing the concept of gender identity into state law. Concerns have been raised that the legislation might allow public schools to override Georgia’s 2022 parental bill of rights, which emphasizes the fundamental right of parents to direct the upbringing and education of their children.

Cole Muzio, president of the Frontline Policy Council, a state social conservative group, voiced apprehension that SB88 could weaken parental rights and claimed it was being advanced with the assistance of the LGBTQ lobby. While concerns have been raised, it is essential to note that the debate surrounding SB88 reflects the ongoing challenge of finding a balance between parental rights and the need to address evolving societal issues in educational settings.

The Protect Students First Act, signed by Republican Gov. Brian Kemp simultaneously with SB88, focuses on prohibiting classroom instruction on certain “divisive concepts.” However, sexual orientation and gender identity were not explicitly included in the list of prohibited concepts.

As a conservative mom, I understand the importance of protecting children from what some perceive as left-wing indoctrination in schools. Recent incidents, such as the tragic story of Yaeli Martinez, underscore the potential dangers of schools reinforcing children’s gender confusion without parental knowledge. The passage of SB88 reflects a broader national trend where parents are increasingly vocal about their concerns regarding the influence of certain ideologies in the education system.

In conclusion, Georgia’s efforts to address the delicate balance between parental rights and evolving societal norms within educational settings highlight the ongoing struggle to find common ground. As discussions surrounding SB88 continue, it is crucial to keep an open dialogue that respects diverse perspectives while prioritizing the well-being and parental involvement in the lives of our children.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.