Raising Them Right
Eliminating Mom and Dad? Scientists Create Human Embryos Without Eggs or Sperm
Researchers in Israel created living models of human embryos in a lab using stem cells without human eggs or sperm. These models resemble 14-day-old embryos and can even produce hormones for positive pregnancy tests.
I can’t help but feel a sense of unease upon hearing about the recent developments in stem cell research at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel. While scientific progress is important, it’s crucial to consider the ethical implications of such breakthroughs, especially when they touch upon the sanctity of human life and the boundaries of what’s morally acceptable.
The idea that researchers have been able to create living models of human embryos in a lab using stem cells is both fascinating and disconcerting. These models are said to mimic a 14-day-old embryo, complete with the ability to release hormones that return a positive pregnancy test in the lab. While this may be seen as a remarkable scientific achievement, it raises several troubling questions.
First and foremost, the use of stem cells to create these embryo-like structures without the need for human eggs or sperm is a departure from the traditional process of human reproduction. It challenges the fundamental values that many conservatives, like myself, hold dear, which include the belief in the importance of natural conception and the sanctity of human life from the moment of conception.
The argument that these models cannot grow to maturity and cannot attach if implanted into a womb may provide some reassurance, but it doesn’t completely alleviate concerns. The fact remains that these artificially created entities resemble human embryos to a remarkable degree, and this resemblance raises ethical red flags.
Proponents of this research argue that it can provide valuable insights into early fetal development issues, such as miscarriages and birth defects. Undoubtedly, understanding these issues is crucial for improving prenatal care and preventing pregnancy complications. However, the concern here is not about the goals of the research but the means by which it is achieved.
The 14-day marker as the widely accepted cut-off for embryo research is important to acknowledge. At this point, embryo cells stop merging and splitting, making it a practical limit for research purposes. However, it also marks a point where the potential for life becomes a more central issue. This is why the ethical implications are so profound.
Perhaps the most significant ethical concern here is the slippery slope this research represents. While the current models are not capable of leading to a pregnancy, we cannot ignore the possibility that further advancements in this field could enable the creation of viable embryos that could develop into full-term pregnancies. This prospect is deeply troubling for those who believe in the inherent value of human life.
The gay agenda has been after kids and this video of Pete Buttigeig’s husband proves it.
WATCH:
Raising Them Right
Shocking Realities of Youth Transgender Healthcare – It Is WORSE Than We Thought!
In a shocking revelation, Environmental Progress recently obtained leaked documents from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), shedding light on the disturbing and sinister reality of youth and adult transgender healthcare. The findings, published by the Daily Caller, uncover a troubling pseudoscience that has infiltrated American children’s lives, surpassing previous expectations.
WPATH’s Influence on Transgender Healthcare:
As the leading organization guiding doctors, hospitals, and clinics on transgender healthcare, WPATH holds significant influence in shaping medical practices for individuals with gender dysphoria. While just three years ago, the transgender craze was perceived as affecting a limited number of confused individuals, the rapid increase in self-identifications, particularly among young girls, has turned it into a widespread societal concern.
The Betrayal of Trust:
At the core of this issue lies the question of whether parents can trust the medical information provided by their doctors. The leaked documents make it abundantly clear that trust in the medical guidance offered by WPATH is misplaced. Shockingly, professionals in the field discussed the necessity of obtaining two authorization letters for the surgical removal of a minor girl’s breasts, dismissing concerns as “gatekeeping.”
Informed Consent and Unproven Science:
The documents reveal a consensus among the world’s top minds in transgender medicine that minors cannot provide informed consent for hormone blockers, cross-sex hormones, or surgeries altering healthy sex organs. This raises concerns about parents lacking the biological knowledge necessary to make informed decisions for their children’s healthcare.
Progressive Activism and Parental Rights:
The attack on parental protections becomes apparent, with progressive activists pushing for policies that separate children from parents who refuse to conform to the “affirmation” model. Parents seeking alternatives may face accusations of abuse, further limiting their ability to make decisions in the best interest of their children.
Misleading Information on Reversibility:
For a significant period, the medical community portrayed hormone blockers and hormonal treatments as reversible or non-permanent solutions. However, the report exposes the falsehood of these claims, revealing lifelong complications such as infertility, lack of orgasm, and an increased risk of developing cancerous masses.
Hidden Dangers of Cross-Sex Hormones:
The WPATH Files detail the dangers of cross-sex hormones, including pelvic inflammatory disease, cardiovascular issues, and even death. Medical professionals recount cases of severe health complications linked to prolonged use of these hormones, highlighting the urgent need for a reassessment of current practices.
Conclusion:
The shocking revelations within the WPATH Files showcase the alarming mistreatment of children in the name of transgender healthcare. The medical community’s obligation to “do no harm” is disregarded in this context, prompting a call for government investigations to ensure the safety and well-being of these vulnerable patients. It is essential to bring attention to these issues and work towards reforms that prioritize the health and future of the children affected by these controversial practices.
In a groundbreaking study led by Dr. Riittakerttu Kaltiala, a former advocate for gender-transition treatments, the mainstream narrative regarding the life-saving nature of such interventions for young people has been called into question. Contrary to popular belief, the study, based on health records from Finland’s national database, reveals that gender-transition treatments have no discernible impact on suicide rates among gender-distressed individuals. Instead, the research highlights a correlation between mental illness and suicide.
The Study Design
Dr. Kaltiala’s study analyzed the health records of 2,083 gender-distressed individuals, who sought assistance at gender clinics in Finland at an average age of 18. This group was tracked for approximately 7 years. To provide a comparative context, a control group of 17,000 individuals without gender-related concerns was also examined.
Surprising Findings
The study challenges the widely held belief that gender-transition treatments, including cross-sex hormones or surgeries, are “life-saving” for young people facing gender distress. While 38% of the gender-distressed group underwent such interventions, the suicide rate observed was just 0.3%, only marginally higher than the 0.1% rate in the control group. The study categorizes both rates as “unusual events,” casting doubt on the notion that gender-transition treatments significantly impact suicide prevention.
Questioning Ethical Standards
Dr. Kaltiala criticized the common practice of gender clinics posing questions to parents such as, “Would you rather have a living son or a dead daughter?” She labeled this approach as “most unethical” and emphasized that it is not grounded in factual evidence. The study suggests a need for a more nuanced and evidence-based dialogue around gender-transition treatments.
Mental Health Correlation
While the study did not find a direct link between gender-transition treatments and suicide rates, it did unveil a “statistically significant relationship” between a high prevalence of co-occurring mental health difficulties and increased suicide risk. This highlights the importance of addressing mental health concerns in conjunction with gender-related issues.
Implications and Contradictions
The research challenges the radical left-wing narrative that has been promulgated by certain medical and LGBTQ groups, claiming that the “science is settled” regarding the life-saving nature of gender-transition treatments. The study’s findings suggest a need for a more nuanced and evidence-based understanding of the complex relationship between gender dysphoria, mental health, and suicide risk.
Conclusion
Dr. Kaltiala’s study presents a significant challenge to the prevailing narrative surrounding gender-transition treatments and their purported life-saving impact on young people. By questioning the ethical standards of communication within gender clinics and highlighting the correlation between mental health difficulties and suicide risk, the research calls for a more informed and balanced approach to discussions on gender-related interventions.
-
Get Right9 months agoBREAKING: Are Flu Shots Harming The Elderly?
-
Did You See This?12 months agoChallenging Mainstream Narratives: Unpacking the Latest Nonsense Study on ‘Top Surgery’
-
Raising Them Right11 months agoBREAKING: CNN Host Grills Fauci on Mask Lies – You Won’t Believe His Response
-
Did You See This?5 months agoBREAKING: DOJ Drops OUTRAGEOUS Lawsuit Against Tennessee
-
Did You See This?12 months agoNew Research Exposes Alarming Connection Between Abortion and Mental Health
-
Did You See This?12 months agoWOW! Did A Federal Court Just Admit They Unfairly Targeted Pro-Lifers?
-
Did You See This?11 months agoBREAKING: Are We Really Going To FORCE KIDS To Wear Masks Again?
-
Did You See This?11 months agoBREAKING: Did Barack Obama Really Smoke Crack and Engage in Same-Sex Relations?
