Connect with us

Did You See This?

Is Mike Pence Right? His Passionate Speech On Conservatism vs Populism Has Us Thinking

Published

on

Former Vice President Mike Pence delivered a passionate denouncement of Republican populism, urging fellow conservatives to uphold traditional values over the burgeoning movement he likens to left-wing progressivism. Speaking at the New Hampshire Institute of Politics at St. Anselm College in Manchester, Pence drew a clear distinction between his vision for the Republican Party and that of populists, particularly former President Donald Trump.

In Pence’s eyes, the schism between traditional conservative principles and populism appears insurmountable, leading the GOP to a crossroads:

“I came here to St. Anselm College to convey, from the depths of my heart, that Republican voters are confronted with a pivotal choice in this state and across the nation as primaries unfold. I firmly believe that this choice will shape the destiny of our party and set the course for our nation in the years to come. So, I pose this question to my fellow Republicans today: In the days ahead, will we remain the party of conservatism, or will we heed the seductive allure of unmoored populism, divorced from conservative values? The future of our movement within this party lies with one or the other, not both. This is because the fundamental chasm between these two factions is impassable.”

Pence contends that, while conservatism within the GOP has historically diverged from liberalism in the Democratic Party, populism now poses an internal threat to conservatism. He views populism as the right-wing counterpart to left-wing progressivism, both representing distinct facets of the same ideology.

“These ideologies are akin travelers on the same path towards ruin,” he asserted, drawing parallels to past populist movements within America.

Pence is troubled by populist Republicans’ apparent willingness to forsake long-standing conservative values within the GOP, including their “belief in limited government,” in favor of an agenda primarily centered on personal grievances and performative outrage.

“Republican populists are prepared to abandon American leadership on the world stage, embracing a stance of appeasement in the face of mounting threats to freedom. They would blatantly undermine our constitutional norms,” he emphasized.

He then turned his attention to his former running mate, Trump, who adopted populist themes upon entering the political arena in 2015, as well as other contenders in the primary field whom Pence perceives as disregarding the U.S. Constitution and the pro-life movement:

“A leading candidate for the Republican nomination last year called for the ‘termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution,’ while those emulating him in this primary race have displayed a willingness to wield government power to enforce their will on opponents. Even after achieving a historic victory for the sanctity of life, Republican populists would relegate the cause of protecting the unborn to the states, much as, in a different era of our nation’s history, those advocating for a great evil sought to leave that question solely to the States.”

Pence emphasized, “There is already a party that advocates appeasement on the global stage. There is already a party that wishes to disregard our national debt. There is already a party seeking to marginalize the right to life.”

The former vice president and former Indiana governor firmly positions himself as “the most qualified, consistent, and proven conservative in this race” and contends that the path of traditional conservatism “must continue to guide our party and our nation as steadfastly today as it has over the past five decades.”

He issued a sobering warning, concluding, “If the new right-wing populism takes hold and steers our party, the Republican Party we have known for so long will cease to exist, and the future of American freedom will be cast into doubt.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Did You See This?

YIKES! This Transgender Breastfeeding Story Is TOO WILD To Even Believe

Published

on

In a shocking and deeply concerning revelation, a transgender biological man with HIV, Murray Pearson, has been actively “breastfeeding” his infant, despite the inherent risk of HIV transmission. What makes this situation even more alarming is the involvement of Canadian doctors who are aiding and abetting this dangerous behavior.

Pearson, who identifies as a woman and goes by the name Margie Fancypants on social media, began his transition in 2022, taking drugs to induce lactation. His journey has been documented on a Reddit forum for transgenders, where he openly discusses his desire to “connect through feeding” his 9-month-old baby. The details of his actions are nothing short of horrifying.

Acknowledging his HIV positive status, Pearson admits that the transmission of the virus to his infant through breast milk is a distinct possibility if his viral load becomes detectable. Viral load refers to the amount of HIV in the blood at a given time. While he plans to monitor his viral load monthly to purportedly “mitigate the risk,” the question remains: why expose the child to any risk in the first place?

The nonchalant use of the term “mitigate risk” in this context is both alarming and irresponsible. The safety and well-being of the infant should be the paramount concern. Why not eliminate the risk entirely by choosing not to expose the child to potential HIV transmission?

One of Pearson’s doctors, Dr. Marina Klein, attempts to justify the situation by stating, “It’s important to emphasize that we do not recommend breastfeeding for people with HIV… [however] If, after informed discussion, a person expresses a wish to breastfeed they may choose to do so provided they are willing to follow a close protocol of viral monitoring.” This raises serious ethical questions about the medical community’s role in enabling such risky choices.

We cannot turn a blind eye to the fact that a child’s health is being compromised for the sake of someone’s personal desires. The decision to breastfeed, despite the potential transmission of a life-altering virus, is simply unacceptable. It is crucial for society to speak out against such actions that put innocent lives at risk.

This disturbing scenario demands not only public awareness but also a reevaluation of medical ethics. The welfare of children must always take precedence over individual choices, especially when those choices can have severe consequences. As we contemplate this distressing situation, our thoughts and prayers go out to the vulnerable infant caught in the midst of this perilous circumstance.

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

Gemini Gate: Learn All About Google’s WOKE AI Disaster

Published

on

In a recent controversy, Google’s artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, Gemini, faced backlash for its image generation tool, which displayed blatant racial bias against white individuals. This incident has ignited concerns about the extent to which Google’s AI algorithms may be influenced by a perceived “woke” ideology.

Gemini, essentially Google’s counterpart to ChatGPT, utilizes AI to generate human-like prompts for various purposes, including writing essays, web code, and, most recently, creating images. However, the tool faced significant criticism when users discovered instances of racial bias in its depictions of historical figures.

Historical figures, including the Founding Fathers, Vikings, and the Pope, were portrayed in a way that seemed to intentionally invert their actual racial identities. The Founding Fathers were depicted as black, Vikings as black and Asian, and the Pope as a black man and an Indian woman. This sparked outrage on social media, prompting Google to take down the image-generation tool and issue an apology, acknowledging that they “got it wrong.”

In their apology, Google hinted at the incorporation of racial “equity” in their strategy, stating that media representation has historically favored white individuals and their achievements. They suggested that focusing solely on white individuals risks perpetuating this imbalance. While acknowledging the need for diverse representation is crucial, the incident raises concerns about the potential bias and lack of nuance in Google’s AI algorithms.

Conservatives and independents have long expressed apprehensions about Google’s left-wing and perceived anti-white bias, particularly in its search tool. This incident adds to a growing list of instances that amplify these concerns. Critics argue that Google’s commitment to diversity and equity may be pushing their AI algorithms towards producing content that is not only inaccurate but also reflects a biased narrative.

Federalist founder Sean Davis pointed out the broader issue, stating, “The purpose of a system is what it produces. Google exists to produce lies and manipulate minds in service of a left-wing ideological agenda.” This sentiment reflects the worry that Google’s AI algorithms may be overly influenced by ideological considerations, compromising their ability to provide objective and unbiased information.

As technology continues to play an integral role in shaping our understanding of the world, it is crucial to hold AI developers accountable for ensuring fairness, accuracy, and impartiality. The Gemini incident serves as a reminder that as AI becomes more sophisticated, the potential for unintended biases and the amplification of certain ideologies also increases. Striking a balance between promoting diversity and avoiding bias is a delicate task that requires continuous scrutiny and improvement in AI development processes.

Continue Reading

Did You See This?

Joe Biden’s Open Borders Endangering American Lives: The Tragic Case of Laken Riley

Published

on

As a concerned parent, I find myself grappling with a sense of profound grief and anger over the tragic murder of 22-year-old University of Georgia nursing student Laken Riley. Her life was cut short in a brutal act of violence that serves as a stark reminder of the consequences of lax immigration policies, particularly the open-border approach championed by President Joe Biden and his administration.

The man charged with this heinous crime is Jose Antonio Ibarra, a Venezuelan national who entered the U.S. illegally in 2022 by crossing the southern border in Texas. Shockingly, this was not Ibarra’s first encounter with law enforcement. In the preceding year, he had been arrested in New York for endangering a 5-year-old child. However, the New York Police Department inexplicably released him before Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) could take appropriate action.

Tragically, this decision had devastating consequences. Last Thursday, Laken Riley went missing after going for a jog on a trail at the University of Georgia. Her lifeless body was discovered in a wooded area off the trail, with law enforcement describing the murder as “a crime of opportunity.” Ibarra has been charged with a litany of serious offenses, including malice murder, felony murder, aggravated battery, aggravated assault, false imprisonment, kidnapping, hindering a 911 call, and concealing the death of another.

What compounds the tragedy is the fact that Athens-Clarke County, where this gruesome murder occurred, is one of four sanctuary cities in Georgia. Sanctuary policies limit cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities, creating an environment where individuals like Ibarra can slip through the cracks and pose a grave danger to the community.

Equally disturbing is the media’s coverage of this heartbreaking incident. The Associated Press, in its reporting, highlighted the “dangers for female joggers” but glaringly omitted any mention that Laken Riley’s killer was an illegal alien who had previously been arrested. This type of selective reporting only serves to obscure the broader issue at hand and contributes to a lack of transparency about the real dangers posed by individuals entering the country illegally.

In the bigger picture, Laken Riley’s blood is on the hands of Joe Biden and every open-border Democrat. Since Biden took office, over 10 million illegal immigrants have been allowed to enter the United States. This staggering number underscores the urgency of reevaluating our immigration policies and addressing the inherent risks associated with an open-border approach.

The safety and well-being of American citizens must be the top priority. It is high time for our leaders to acknowledge the devastating consequences of their policies and take concrete actions to protect the lives of individuals like Laken Riley, who should never have fallen victim to a system that failed to prioritize the safety and security of its own citizens.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.